- 21,856
- 30,578
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Don't sleep on avocados.
Word. But according to sckid you have no business in the hood if you got avocados in your crib
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Don't sleep on avocados.
You go to Dr. Nick Riviera?
How's that taste? I'm intrigued.
View media item 1974373
Been pretty much plant based since January. I went shopping today and picked these up for a dinner either tonight or tomorrow. There's 164 grams of protein between the black been noodles and seitan. I haven't really missed meat that much either.
Damn, dude, you went full hippie. I ain't ever seen black bean spaghetti before.
Damn, dude, you went full hippie. I ain't ever seen black bean spaghetti before.
View media item 1974407
Dem macros, tho
The washington heights diet + you being black will probably kill you faster than vegetarians
That white vegan chick I'm dating from chelsea will outlive you by 30 years, easily.
Yea I've said it in other vegan threads, you really need to know what you're doing if you're going to go vegan or vegetarian. All those processed fake meats will kill you as fast as a cheese burger. And soy is horrible for you.
I think part of what makes vegans healthy, is that people who are vegan/vegetarian tend to be health conscious overall. Just a speculation.
Not gonna lie, this stuff looks ok.
Word. But according to sckid you have no business in the hood if you got avocados in your crib
Word. But according to sckid you have no business in the hood if you got avocados in your crib
This is Real talk nobody had avocados lol
Hmm how this taste? Been on an edamame spaghetti tip lately, very similar macro distribution.Mirin the fiber contentDamn, dude, you went full hippie. I ain't ever seen black bean spaghetti before.
Dem macros, tho
Your bowel moments must be flourishin
srs question...
so what if you eat a lot of meat and vegetables?
because my diet is literally meat and veggies almost every meal. i really love both.
i eat very little sugar. less than 30g a day.
i eat a very low carb diet..my only carbs really come from veggies.
Can you explain? Not like natural unprocessed soy beans right?
i do lift but im no beast. i am lean though with a good amount of muscle mass.That's low key the paleo diet. If you start lifting you'll be a beast.
Oh ok yea I knew about the estrogenic effects, I definitely wouldn't want to depend on soy as a source of protein.Let me rephrase that, soy has some healthy properties in moderations but too much soy is horrible for you.
Can you explain? Not like natural unprocessed soy beans right?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/soybean-fertility-hormone-isoflavones-genistein/
https://authoritynutrition.com/is-soy-bad-for-you-or-good/
It has to do with the estrogenic effects of soy, eating that stuff everyday is not good for you. It can cause and exacerbate certain cancers (breast, thyroid),
As I understand it a balanced intake of carbohydrates is pretty essential to muscle recovery. If you're goal is gain muscle, cutting out carbs is a mistake.i do lift but im no beast. i am lean though with a good amount of muscle mass.That's low key the paleo diet. If you start lifting you'll be a beast.
so are there problems that occur with this paleo diet?
i do lift but im no beast. i am lean though with a good amount of muscle mass.
so are there problems that occur with this paleo diet?
Let me rephrase that, soy has some healthy properties in moderations but too much soy is horrible for you.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/soybean-fertility-hormone-isoflavones-genistein/
https://authoritynutrition.com/is-soy-bad-for-you-or-good/
It has to do with the estrogenic effects of soy, eating that stuff everyday is not good for you. It can cause and exacerbate certain cancers (breast, thyroid),
damn meth back at it again with another ninjahood sonning
That's a terribly specious headline. I can't say I'm surprised, however.
So, first of all (and as others have stated), you can find tons of research demonstrating links between meat consumption - especially red meat consumption - and heart disease, along with various forms of cancer.
This, for example, is more of an "apples to apples" comparison: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/22/2/286.full You're flogging this particular study and will likely ignore everything else. That's your choice, but you should at least understand what, exactly, your chosen study suggests about vegetarian diets.
Bear in mind, the study you've cited compares two very different population groups: one in Pune, India, where "mostly vegetarian" diets have been common for generations, and one in Kansas, where residents presumably engage in what's become known as a "standard American diet."
To suggest, from this, that any vegetarian or vegan anywhere in the world is "more likely" to develop cancer or heart disease would demonstrate an abject misunderstanding of the study and almost total ignorance to the concept of heredity.
Note the very first sentence in your little news write up: "Over generations, a vegetarian diet can result in genetic mutations which increase the risk of heart disease and cancer, scientists claim."
The inter-generational nature of this is key. If you eat vegetables, it's not going to "mutate da genes." Carrots are not radioactive spiders from a comic book. If you were born in Pune, India, moved to Kansas, and decided to eat Arby's seven days a week, you're more likely to have the trait that these researchers claim facilitates the absorption of essential fatty acids from plants and may boost arachidonic acid production. Your children would be more likely to have this trait, too.
As the study's lead author put it, "Those whose ancestry derives from vegetarians are more likely to carry genetics that more rapidly metabolize plant fatty acids." That should not be used interchangeably with "vegetarians." No one with even a middle school comprehension of genetics would make this mistake.
Diet is only relevant in that it influenced the conditions within which the trait became common.
If you had this trait hundreds of years ago in Pune, India, where people mostly ate vegetarian diets, you might be more likely to survive and, thus, procreate. In the same way, it's been theorized that a mutated copy of the gene that causes sickle cell anemia actually confers a survival advantage against malaria. Those whose ancestry derives from environments with a high risk of malaria are more likely to have the "sickle cell trait" for the same basic reason that "those whose ancestry derives from vegetarians are more likely to carry genetics that more rapidly metabolize plant fatty acids." The role of the environment is critical. If you ignore that, you might say something colossally imbecilic like "Brown skin causes sickle cell anemia!"
Here in the United States in 2016, the possession of this fatty acid absorption trait would have virtually no bearing whatsoever on whether or not a vegetarian or vegan manages to reproduce. How, then, is such a mutation likely to propagate - and, more importantly, why would it be exclusive to vegetarians or vegans?
As an aside, I'd be very curious to compare the actual rates of cancer and heart disease between Pune, India and Anywhere, Kansas.