How Do You Feel about the HB2 law? VOL....NORTH CAROLINA

Like what "flaws"? The only people who think this is a "flaw" are people that aren't transgender. People use the same argument about homosexuality, it's basically throwing negatively coded words that mean nothing at a group of people. Aside from bigots treating them like crap, homosexuality and trangenderism is ego-syntonic. They don't mind how they feel, they just want to be able to express it openly.


The problem isn't transgender people, the problem is YOU.



These traits are too common amongst human beings to be a simple genetic aberration, i see it as a variation NOT a flaw.

I think your sexual preference got you a lil on edge :lol:

I have no issues with homosexuals nor ******s so kill that mess.

I'm not saying they are a problem.

I find the ****** thing weird as hell but that's about it.

The main reason for the genetic sex make up is for reproduction right?

So how in the hell is anything but male/female relations not a flaw?
 
Says who? Advocates getting people to adopt that? Go look up that gender spectrum theory,


All roads lead back to advocacy groups.


Like i said, transsexuals biggest enemies aont even males, its OTHER women who are goin to get their whole identity co-opted by men.


I have a master in marriage and family therapy. and most of my research is based around gender, race, and power.

I've participated in research.

This isn't water cooler discussion for me. 

This is a huge part of my career.

So u would know more than ANYONE none of this has a consensus in da scientific community... Especially on a group of individuals that represents 1 tenth of one percent of da US population..

To put it in perspective, there's a bigger population of idiot monsters reppin NAMBLA.

But yo, idc bout this at all anyways so...
 
You comparing men being able to use a women's restroom to civil rights is a slap in da face of civil rights thou.

Im [emoji]128564[/emoji] thou
you'd prob say the same thing about segregated bathrooms and water fountains for blacks and whites if you were alive for that time.

stay schleep 
 
You comparing men being able to use a women's restroom to civil rights is a slap in da face of civil rights thou.


Im [emoji]128564[/emoji] thou


you'd prob say the same thing about segregated bathrooms and water fountains for blacks and whites if you were alive for that time.

stay schleep 

Fine wanna take this to your logical conclusion? Lets go.

Will you be one da front lines of civil rights when NAMBLA demands their own concessions of inclusiveness & tolerance?

[emoji]129300[/emoji] :nerd:
 
Last edited:
While i couldn't really care less who uses what restroom as i or my wife accompany our children,

& I don't believe a genuine transgender person presents any more danger in a restroom than anyone else.

I do believe it does open the door for creeps to take advantage of the fact nobody is now going to be as alarmed by what would appear to be a male using the women's restroom.

Why cant their be more discussion about whether or not this is an mental disorder? because it genuinely confuses me why it's not considered one.

Ninja has a point at what point do we draw a line? That video he posted of the college kids was terrifying we're really getting to point that people are so afraid of offending folks they will let anything rock, or at least pretend to be ok with it in public which is just as bad.
 
Fine wanna take this to your logical conclusion? Lets go.

Will you be one da front lines of civil rights when NAMBLA demands their own concessions of inclusiveness & tolerance?

[emoji]129300[/emoji]
nerd.gif
wait so your logic is that, transgender is the same as pedophilia?
 
wait so your logic is that, transgender is the same as pedophilia?

Pretty sure his point is more so when do you tell someone no to their life choices and how do you justify it if you let everyone else do whatever they wanted.
 
wait so your logic is that, transgender is the same as pedophilia?

Pretty sure his point is more so when do you tell someone no to their life choices and how do you justify it if you let everyone else do whatever they wanted.

Bingo.

Not to mention NAMBLA was one of da OG gay rights advocate groups.

Many gay rights pioneers also advocated for NAMBLA.

So da question remains, ya gonna be on da civil rights front lines when NAMBLA demands inclusiveness & tolerance? :nerd: [emoji]129300[/emoji]

They faaaaaar outnumber da transsexual community.
 
Last edited:
Who said anything about homosexuals or hurting anyone?


If a 30 yr old man and a 15yr old boy mutually agree to have sex who is it hurting?
bro. you're the homey, but are u serious with that second question man?
 
bro. you're the homey, but are u serious with that second question man?

I'm dead serious & don't dodge it like you did ninja's question.

If a 15 yr old boy decides on his own he's attracted to a 30 yr old man and wants to have sex WHO is it hurting?

Thats Ninja's whole point how do you tell one group of people it's ok to come to the conclusion you are not the gender you were born and it's fine to cut off your genitalia and then tell someone else that they can't live how they see fit because of age?

If gender isn't real why is age?
 
I'm dead serious & don't dodge it like you did ninja's question.

If a 15 yr old boy decides on his own he's attracted to a 30 yr old man and wants to have sex WHO is it hurting?

Thats Ninja's whole point how do you tell one group of people it's ok to come to the conclusion you are not the gender you were born and it's fine to cut off your genitalia and then tell someone else that they can't live how they see fit because of age?

If gender isn't real why is age?
who said gender isn't real.

in terms of age, the reason why statutory rape exists is because a child/adolescent brain is not as fully developed.

thus a power issue when it comes to age.

i am honestly taken aback by what you're saying my dude.
 
who said gender isn't real.

in terms of age, the reason why statutory rape exists is because a child/adolescent brain is not as fully developed.

thus a power issue when it comes to age.

i am honestly taken aback by what you're saying my dude.

Thats what this entire community of people believes my guy that gender isn't about the physical it's about the mental.

So let me get this straight a child's brain isn't developed enough at 15 to decide who he does and doesn't want to have sex with? Yet this same community would want you to accept a 15yr old who tells you he was born a girl?

Doesn't the same "power" issue exist when a 50 yr old man who's established in life decides to date younger women?

You're only taken aback because you can't answer it
 
in terms of age, the reason why statutory rape exists is because a child/adolescent brain is not as fully developed.

thus a power issue when it comes to age.

Thats funny you say that about that whole "underage thing"

Coming to a town near you..

http://www.medicaldaily.com/gender-...oregon-minors-without-parental-consent-342670

Gender reassignment is a procedure that Bruce Jenner underwent to complete his transformation from male to female. While he is a consenting adult, the new law in Oregon allows for minors as young as 15 to get the surgery, even without consent from their parents.

Health Evidence Review Commission (HERC) was petitioned by Jenn Burleton, co-founder of the Portland-based Trans Active Gender Center, to include sex change operations, cross-sex hormone therapy, and puberty-inhibiting medications in the covered procedures for the management of individuals with gender dysphoria. The HERC 12-member panel includes doctors and medical professionals, all of whom are approved by the governor. The change to cover the procedures was settled in January without public debate.

Under developed brains...but still perfectly able to do decide to lop off their member and undergo hormone treatment PAID by tax money without parent concent...how Rich..

Still waiting on my civil rights question about NAMBLA..... [emoji]129300[/emoji] :nerd:
 
Last edited:
So getting a sex change equates doing something TO a young boy? Being transgender is not automatically an ACT against someone else. :lol:

I spoke exclusively about mutually agreed upon sex not anyone doing anything to anyone

Stop trying to intentionally misrepresent what I'm saying, I'm sure you're only doing so because you lack a genuine answer
 
Another person who probably failed high school biology is trying to teach me about it.


Most individuals in most animal species NEVER get to reproduce. In some species there is a Queen or an Alpha male who fathers a majority of the offspring. In certain species many individuals are actual STERILE!!!!! In hyenas the sisters who don't have children engage in homosexuals behavior, while helping one sister raise her children which helps increase genetic fitness. With limited resources it is most cost effective to help your sibling indirectly continue your genes rather than everyone raising multiple children.


There's a formula for an individual's genetic fitness that takes everything I said into account.


Stop making a mockery of biology and genetics. :smh: You sound worse than ninjahood.


EUSOCIALISM, may be too many big words on here for you but its a good start

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eusociality

Got em in his feels?

I thought we were talkin about humans feelin the need to vhop their ***** off not a frog in Africa.
 
So getting a sex change equates doing something TO a young boy? Being transgender is not automatically an ACT against someone else. :lol:

I spoke exclusively about mutually agreed upon sex not anyone doing anything to anyone

Stop trying to intentionally misrepresent what I'm saying, I'm sure you're only doing so because you lack a genuine answer

Its his whole shtick..

Still waiting on da civil rights question for NAMBLA [emoji]129300[/emoji]
 
I love these reaches. I'm sure when the slaves were freed someone was like, today we give the negro people rights, what's next tomorrow we gonna let baboons vote? :\  


I mean where's THEIR civil rights movement b? Where do we draw the line?

Here comes the slave analogy :rofl:

Never fails
 
Oh 2 sentences, that's it? :lol:   Go read, don't come at me with that nonsense again. Stick to calling people homos and keep it moving. Scientific bigotry has never worked for uneducated people. Stay in your lane.

My bad, got more in my life then to argue with someone who keeps throwing out insults but as soon as someone calls you out as the clown you are you run and hide behind your sexuality like its a shield.

Noone is tryna stop you from smashin ******s bruh.

Let the hurt go.
 
Yea I'm throwing out insults but its ok to compare homosexuals to child molesters right? :lol: It's ok to use pseudoscientific bigotry to try to diminish their existence right. We've seen this before, it's nothing new. You're gonna be written into history with all the other bigots, society doesn't stop because you refuse to adapt.


Read a damn book.

Show me where someone did this?

You continually interject FLAT OUT LIES into an argument as if someone actually said it, I assume to try and sway folks who haven't read the whole thread or to distract folks as you dodge direct questions.

Your ******** tactics aren't going unnoticed.
 
Stop extrapolating a pedophile group erroneously using the gay rights movement

Oh u you're into revisionist history? Cool.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Hay

Henry "Harry" Hay, Jr. (April 7, 1912 – October 24, 2002) was a prominent American gay rights activist, communist, labor advocate, and Native American civil rights campaigner. He was a founder of the Mattachine Society, the first sustained gay rights group in the United States, as well as the Radical Faeries, a loosely affiliated gay spiritual movement.


[B]Hay joined several other early gay rights activists in protesting the exclusion of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) from participation in LGBT social movements, most noticeably pride parades on the grounds that such exclusions pandered to heterosexual-dominated society.[102] When questioned on his support for NAMBLA in a 1983 New York University forum, he remarked "If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world", highlighting his own relationship with an adult man when he was 14.[175] At the 1986 Los Angeles Gay Pride Parade he courted controversy by carrying a banner with "NAMBLA Walks With Me" written on it, after organizers banned the group from joining the march; the organisers complained to police and he narrowly avoided arrest.[/B][176]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom