- 4,837
- 215
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
Originally Posted by whiterails
So what's your source?
Would it matter to you what or who my source is? I'm just a conspiracy theorist, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by whiterails
So what's your source?
Very rarely does a party run a primary against their own party's president (last time was Teddy Kennedy against Jimmy Carter)... Even if they pick someone good to challenge the current president it splinters the party, and makes it much less likely for the controlling party of the presidency to keep control of it for re-election...Originally Posted by Kramer
I'm not gonna lie I haven't followed this too closely, but do the democrats have anyone good running against Obama?
Very rarely does a party run a primary against their own party's president (last time was Teddy Kennedy against Jimmy Carter)... Even if they pick someone good to challenge the current president it splinters the party, and makes it much less likely for the controlling party of the presidency to keep control of it for re-election...Originally Posted by Kramer
I'm not gonna lie I haven't followed this too closely, but do the democrats have anyone good running against Obama?
Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by whiterails
So what's your source?
Would it matter to you what or who my source is? I'm just a conspiracy theorist, right?
Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by whiterails
So what's your source?
Would it matter to you what or who my source is? I'm just a conspiracy theorist, right?
Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by CallHimAR
rashi wrote:
The only person out of everyone you mentioned, including the sitting President that IS NOT in favor of sending robotic unmanned drones into foreign countries to kill civilians, on top of establishing "no fly zones" that prevent food from getting into countries. Yeah, deservedly so, apparently you have to be a cold blooded killer to be considered to be President of the United States.
Also the only person out of all the candidates he mentioned who is delusional enough to believe that when left to check themselves, corporations will act for the benefit of the people and not for personal gain. This has historically been proven wrong time and time again, prior to the Great Depression as well as over the course of the past decade when the banking industry was deregulated which led to the financial crisis.
Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by CallHimAR
rashi wrote:
The only person out of everyone you mentioned, including the sitting President that IS NOT in favor of sending robotic unmanned drones into foreign countries to kill civilians, on top of establishing "no fly zones" that prevent food from getting into countries. Yeah, deservedly so, apparently you have to be a cold blooded killer to be considered to be President of the United States.
Also the only person out of all the candidates he mentioned who is delusional enough to believe that when left to check themselves, corporations will act for the benefit of the people and not for personal gain. This has historically been proven wrong time and time again, prior to the Great Depression as well as over the course of the past decade when the banking industry was deregulated which led to the financial crisis.
Originally Posted by devildog1776
The dollar will crash regardless... Can't stop the inevitable
Originally Posted by Rexanglorum
What makes Bachmann so unelectable? Is it because she is lacks experience? She has been in Congress for more years than President Obama was in Congress. Does she lack a compelling personal story? taking in a multitude of foster kids is just as compelling as being the first black president. Despite the caricature of her being a dumb and uneducated hick, she is a lawyer and was a fairly good one so that means that she went to graduate school and got a Juris Doctor degree and practiced law (tax law no less, something that is perhaps a bit relavent in these times). She has made some strange and extremist staements just like President Obama did at one time or another ( In our own lives, we all make a few extreme statements or statements that are factually incorrect. in the past and if we are public figures they find their way to the immortality of the cameras).
I do not long to she her as the President but she is not unelectable. I think that many Democrats believe that if you are a Republican you are dumb and uneducated, no matter how much the facts suggest otherwise. It reminds of how Democrats believe that their candidates will always overwhelming "win" their debates with the Republican candidate and yet the results tend to be pretty even for both sides. It is the confirmation bias at its worse, if you are a Democrat, you are presumed smart regardless of the facts and all Republicans are presumed to be stupid, no matter the facts.
Originally Posted by devildog1776
The dollar will crash regardless... Can't stop the inevitable
Originally Posted by Rexanglorum
What makes Bachmann so unelectable? Is it because she is lacks experience? She has been in Congress for more years than President Obama was in Congress. Does she lack a compelling personal story? taking in a multitude of foster kids is just as compelling as being the first black president. Despite the caricature of her being a dumb and uneducated hick, she is a lawyer and was a fairly good one so that means that she went to graduate school and got a Juris Doctor degree and practiced law (tax law no less, something that is perhaps a bit relavent in these times). She has made some strange and extremist staements just like President Obama did at one time or another ( In our own lives, we all make a few extreme statements or statements that are factually incorrect. in the past and if we are public figures they find their way to the immortality of the cameras).
I do not long to she her as the President but she is not unelectable. I think that many Democrats believe that if you are a Republican you are dumb and uneducated, no matter how much the facts suggest otherwise. It reminds of how Democrats believe that their candidates will always overwhelming "win" their debates with the Republican candidate and yet the results tend to be pretty even for both sides. It is the confirmation bias at its worse, if you are a Democrat, you are presumed smart regardless of the facts and all Republicans are presumed to be stupid, no matter the facts.