- 415
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
Look at this Top 100 Basketball Shoes of All Time vol..i dont know about that
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by servedchilled,
- Start date
- 2,961
- 15
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
and did they really just rank the Jordan 60+ above the IV's??
and SMH at the XX3's being ranked behind the XIX's...
i've got so many problems with this list.
that list sucks.
- 2,961
- 15
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
and did they really just rank the Jordan 60+ above the IV's??
and SMH at the XX3's being ranked behind the XIX's...
i've got so many problems with this list.
that list sucks.
- 160
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
Yea man, check Ijapino's post. The IV's are #27 and the 60+ is #24. Blasphemy!!! IMO the IV's are more memorable. Hello? Shot over Ehlo to beat the Cavs!!!Originally Posted by jordan supreme
and did they really just rank the Jordan 60+ above the IV's??
- 160
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
Yea man, check Ijapino's post. The IV's are #27 and the 60+ is #24. Blasphemy!!! IMO the IV's are more memorable. Hello? Shot over Ehlo to beat the Cavs!!!Originally Posted by jordan supreme
and did they really just rank the Jordan 60+ above the IV's??
- 4,172
- 2,753
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2003
I dunno who's behind that list, but that ranking is HORRIBLE. That Jordan 60+ should not have made the top 1000 let a lone the top 100. Putting the Jordan 1 before the Chuck T is a no no sorry, and there were waaaaaaaaay to many dope shoes missing from that list. Did the agassi's even make it cause I didn't see them. I think its time to put a LEGIT list together and post that up, cause that one was an absolute disgrace.
- 4,172
- 2,753
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2003
I dunno who's behind that list, but that ranking is HORRIBLE. That Jordan 60+ should not have made the top 1000 let a lone the top 100. Putting the Jordan 1 before the Chuck T is a no no sorry, and there were waaaaaaaaay to many dope shoes missing from that list. Did the agassi's even make it cause I didn't see them. I think its time to put a LEGIT list together and post that up, cause that one was an absolute disgrace.
- 3,490
- 13
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2001
Foams are light weight?
Wow.
Wow.
- 3,490
- 13
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2001
Foams are light weight?
Wow.
Wow.
- 14,370
- 243
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
Some of that $+$$ shouldn't have even made it.
- 14,370
- 243
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
Some of that $+$$ shouldn't have even made it.
- 625
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
this is a horrible list and look at basketball sneakers. i wouldn't rock half of those, not to mention dude had like 10 spelling errors.
- 625
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
this is a horrible list and look at basketball sneakers. i wouldn't rock half of those, not to mention dude had like 10 spelling errors.
- 1,207
- 105
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2001
I died at this too.
- 1,207
- 105
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2001
I died at this too.
- 3,030
- 542
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2004
converse weapon top 10??? well anyway aint no way one could make a top 100 in the right order... but a lot of heat on that list..... good thang!
- 3,030
- 542
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2004
converse weapon top 10??? well anyway aint no way one could make a top 100 in the right order... but a lot of heat on that list..... good thang!
- 208
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
GRANT HILL IIIs %+%!!! lol
- 208
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
GRANT HILL IIIs %+%!!! lol
- 208
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
Shox Vision OVER IX....omg i gotta stop now
- 208
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
Shox Vision OVER IX....omg i gotta stop now
- 11,539
- 7,076
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
this
- 11,539
- 7,076
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
this
- 335
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2009
The ranking is horrible. The guy must have just taken every basketball shoe he could think of and listed it. But they were all BASKETBALL shoes. Hence the Agassi's non-inclusion.
- 335
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2009
The ranking is horrible. The guy must have just taken every basketball shoe he could think of and listed it. But they were all BASKETBALL shoes. Hence the Agassi's non-inclusion.
