Magic, Jordan, Kobe and Lebron Vol. First RING numbers.

[duba169]

Okay in my nom hater moment its stupid to compare wht kobe did to lebron. Just let it go and playout. He needs 3 rings as main guy. Nothing's else to discuss

 

[acbboyz84]

Originally Posted by quik1987

Originally Posted by ACBboyz84

Oh wow  the Pacers was so hard to beat compare to the Blazer

. The NBA season consist of one series

. You completely ignored Kobe game 4. Horry and Fisher had a similar performance like Kobe in the series and they were as good or better than Kobe too right ?

You're out of resource. It's getting desperate for you in trying to minimize Kobe role

Who said i want this thread to get locked up? We can go on forever

Originally Posted by ACBboyz84

Another pointless illustration. Stick to the point of the discussion or take your L. Getting desperate to minimize Kobe ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w...ievements_by_Kobe_Bryant

There are many records that Kobe has that most of the guy in your list doesn't have.

Stick to the discussion or take the L. You're getting desperate

Originally Posted by ACBboyz84

Oh now you say you didn't bring it up lol

. Why did you post that picture then? You didn't bring it up but somehow that end up in your response okkkkkk

Desperation.

Originally Posted by ACBboyz84

Kobe win 2 rings without help of Gasol?
Shaq won 3 rings without help of Kobe?
Kobe won 3 rings without help of Shaq?

I didn't know one dude can win a championship by himself without a 2nd or 3rd option

yea getting desperate now for you

Originally Posted by ACBboyz84

Huh? When did i say anything regard Kobe season MVP? I said the list that you showed has nothing to do with Kobe earning his rings. You're really reaching for the lol. You're desperate dude lol
Go back the last page and quote me where i said anything about Kobe season MVP in regard to that out of no where list of your.
That's right. You're desperate hahah. Defeated haha

How desperate of you. Stop projecting your emotions b. Pull your skirt up.

Oh you want more? Ok one more for you. You're desperate. Give it up

 

[6 Rings G.O.A.T.]

This thread is entertaining..

 

[xtapolapacetl]

Originally Posted by devildog1776

Originally Posted by quik1987

In this series, Kobe = role player

Kobe stans want to lock this thread up so they can bury the evidence.

2nd in pts
2nd in blks

2nd in asst

2nd in blks

and 1st in FT % IS A ROLE PLAYER????? 

GET THESE DWEEBS OUT THIS THREAD

BRIAN SHAW TOOK LIKE 2 FTS THE WHOLE SERIES, SO HIS % IS VOID

I can't believe the persistence of the Kobe lobby on this forum. Take off the Kobe glasses and look at those numbers a little better. That is one of THE worst finals stat lines of all time for a #2 player on a winning team. If you think that I'm exaggerating with this statement, here go through all the finals since 1970 and find me a #2 guy on a winning team with worse numbers:

http://www.basketball-ref...ffs/NBA_1970_finals.html

You won't find many, that's for sure. I can save you some time - 1975, 1994, 2003 and maybe 2006. If you look at those numbers a little better, you'll see that was barely better than Ron Harper. He took TWICE as many shots as Ron Harper to average a measly 5 points more in 5 more minutes played. Son took 18 shots per game to average 15.6 points. Amazing, how did he do it?

 

[xtapolapacetl]

I also found out that the 2000 Finals have the record for the biggest difference in scoring ppg between the leading and the second leading scorer on a winning team:

Shaq - 38.0 ppg
Kobe - 15.6 ppg

That is a difference of 22.4 points.

2. 2006 finals - 20.9 ppg difference between Dwyane Wade and Antoine Walker
3. 1993 finals - 19.8 ppg difference between Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen
4. 1975 finals - 18.0 ppg difference between Rick Barry and Jamaal Wilkes

 

[devildog1776]

Originally Posted by quik1987

Originally Posted by devildog1776

Originally Posted by quik1987

In this series, Kobe = role player

Kobe stans want to lock this thread up so they can bury the evidence.

2nd in pts
2nd in blks

2nd in asst

2nd in blks

and 1st in FT % IS A ROLE PLAYER????? 

GET THESE DWEEBS OUT THIS THREAD

BRIAN SHAW TOOK LIKE 2 FTS THE WHOLE SERIES, SO HIS % IS VOID

You had to reach to FT% and dismiss Shaw just so that you could say that Kobe was number 1 at something

 

 

[QU!K]

Okay in my nom hater moment its stupid to compare wht kobe did to lebron. Just let it go and playout. He needs 3 rings as main guy. Nothing's else to discuss

[emoji]128064[/emoji]