- 29,654
- 39,356
- Joined
- May 25, 2004
You wanna rely on the gov't gotta play by their rules. I can't stand the gov't so you won't see me asking for favors I don't want them to feel like I owe them shhh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Pretty much, damn a handout.You wanna rely on the gov't gotta play by their rules. I can't stand the gov't so you won't see me asking for favors I don't want them to feel like I owe them shhh.
You know TONS of people in there late 20's-30's using drugs and on welfare huh?? Sure you do champ.I know tons of people in there late 20s-30s on welfare, but popping mollies like Steve Francis and up in the club like Dirk Nowitzki all turned up off ecstasy and other illegal substances, including that smack
This was tried in Florida, ended up costing the state more and the positive testing was very minimal. Just another way to demonize the poor.
It did help that the testing clinics were owned by the governors wife though, no conflict of interest there.
Cant tell if sarcasm.Yep. This is exactly what this is. The man trying to keep us down.Just another way to isolate a particular demographic.
It's 2014. And the more things change, the more they stay the same.
No accountability for the welfare recipients who somehow have money to buy weed, coke, and pills.
Some companies like mine, Hilton are no longer requiring drug tests in the screening process... You'd be surprised how much it gets people back in the door for an interview opposed to when they're told they have to head down to the local Med facility to get urine tested. Its a huge saving's in not only money but time wasted from interviewing people and never seeing them again because they know they have dirty urine.yep. drug testing is a good business.
Urinalysis cost company around 30 dollars per test and hair is like 70 from what I hear. On top of the cost for a background test.
Something else that hinders the applicant process for jobs.
Lol at that Senator saying this. Fireman and Policeman are tested though. But really, how is the welfare program suppose to work for those on it when SOME people are using it for drugs? I am for helping people out, but not those that are abusing it.“The companies we give tax breaks to are not required to be drug tested. We give out tax credits to schools, students and police and fire, and now the only ones subject to drug screening are the poorest of the poor.”
You know TONS of people in there late 20's-30's using drugs and on welfare huh?? Sure you do champ.
meh users gonnna use regardless
Florida has implemented a similar program and referred about 22% of recipients for drug testing. Only 5% tested positive for drug use.
Good. Like you said, if you're buying drugs and using then you shouldn't expect the government to help you get through life.
Most policies like the one implemented in Michigan fail and are ineffective in addressing issues that concern the poor. Policy makers often fail to properly analyze the effectiveness of new policies before they implement them. As you stated this is just another way to demonize the poor and subject them to more social control. Corporations receive wayyy more welfare then the poor and folk who work for them are probably more likely to use drugs. We waste money fighting unnecessary wars abroad plus we warehouse non-violent drug offenders. If we addressed some of those issues previously mentioned we'd be better off as a nation, but society is over concerned with punishing the poor for their lower caste status in society.This was tried in Florida, ended up costing the state more and the positive testing was very minimal. Just another way to demonize the poor.
It did help that the testing clinics were owned by the governors wife though, no conflict of interest there.
Quote:
Lol at that Senator saying this. Fireman and Policeman are tested though. But really, how is the welfare program suppose to work for those on it when SOME people are using it for drugs? I am for helping people out, but not those that are abusing it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/us/florida-law-on-drug-testing-for-welfare-is-struck-down.htmlOnly 108 out of 4,086 people tested — 2.6 percent — were found to have been using narcotics. State records showed that the requirement cost more money to carry out than it saved.
More big government Yay!!!! Where are the republicans when you need them?
You guys sound like the kids in school who would beg to take names when the teacher had to leave the classroom
The kids who ask for more homework when the teacher almost forgets...smh
I expect more from you Nako...The family gets welfare from the parent/guardian. Because of this law if the parent is dipping into that to buy drugs it means the children would be cut off as well. Regardless of if the parent is using the welfare funds for drugs or not. They could be getting drugs from elsewhere. But all are harmed.Good. Like you said, if you're buying drugs and using then you shouldn't expect the government to help you get through life.
Ignore that poverty/crime/drugs all go hand in hand and are a direct result of previous and coming laws that Republicans put in place to pin down the lower classes.
But good right?
Exactly the point on why this bill needs to pass NATIONALLY.
If you can't stop then don't expect 'handouts' from the Govt. It's either receive assistance, a roof over your head, and food for your children or do illegal drugs? Not a hard choice if I was in that position considering there are other substances like alcohol.
So in Fl, 1 out of 4 whom were tested didn't pass. Looks like these programs somewhat works.
I am not here to be in a political argument, yes I am aware that people receive tax breaks. The thread is about drug users that are on welfare. What is your stance?You do know that you are also "Helping out" on giving millionaires tax breaks and that it's probably more expensive to keep the rich rich then the poor poor
Shocked democrats are against expanding the state's power and creating more unionized government jobs.
I have a problem with my tax money being wasted, period. Nothing I can really do about it, I am just expressing an opinion. Not all millionaires are people that are addicted to money, they can be people really good at what they do or had one hell of an idea. There are some that also give back large amounts of money to their communities as well.so you have a problem with your tax money being used on people addicted to drugs but have no problems with it being used on people addicted to money?