- 13,529
- 9,454
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2008
>Implying that's not the best strategy
Bruce would coax pea-brain Tyson into boarding a one way flight to Antarctica and Iron Mike would freeze to death before he even knew what happened.
Last edited:
Mike Tyson Vs Bruce Lee #Garcia in my garage bruh
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by blastercombo,
- Start date
>Implying that's not the best strategy
Bruce would coax pea-brain Tyson into boarding a one way flight to Antarctica and Iron Mike would freeze to death before he even knew what happened.
- 10,497
- 10,529
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
I'm convinced you wear a helmet 24/7.
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
- 27,294
- 15,000
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2011
I was thinking the exact same ****.
Like I said, as big of a Mike fan as I am, he isn't even considered one of the best boxers we've seen.
But he's the greatest, b.
At least to me :\
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
The other thing about lees kicks, powerful kicks render you very open for a counter if you miss.
*waits for* lee never misses
*waits for* lee never misses
- 4,589
- 616
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2003
That's a HORRIBLE example cause i GURANTEE you can find the SAME **** of a boxer getting the SNOT beat out them facing an opponent with another style too.
- 22,843
- 29,555
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2003
Right. And saying Donnie Yen can kick Mike Tyson's butt is......speculation. You might want to look up the definition
And no, he's not.
You're exposing just how little you know about boxing right now. Sometimes it's just better to fall back.
at dudes posting old *** UFC vids of grappler vs. Wing Chun in a thread about boxer vs. JKD. The whole point of JKD was that Wing Chun was limited. Ben Saunders beat a BJJ Black Belt once. AMAZING!
The reeeeeeeaching sometimes is too much.
Last edited:
- 22,843
- 29,555
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2003
Ah. The backpeddaling begins.
The entire thread is speculation. Period.
The "reach" wasn't in reference to you by the way.
You front like you're "not with that speculation", then proceed to speculate.
There is ZERO evidence, not "little", but ZERO, that says Bruce can beat Mike.
There is also ZERO evidence that Mike can beat Bruce.
And that will never change. So everything about this thread is speculation.
I'm sure there is little evidence and footage of boxers from the early 1900's who could have possibly beaten Mike down.
Please also note that nowhere in this thread have I suggested that Bruce would "win".
Thank you and good day.
The entire thread is speculation. Period.
The "reach" wasn't in reference to you by the way.
You front like you're "not with that speculation", then proceed to speculate.
There is ZERO evidence, not "little", but ZERO, that says Bruce can beat Mike.
There is also ZERO evidence that Mike can beat Bruce.
And that will never change. So everything about this thread is speculation.
I'm sure there is little evidence and footage of boxers from the early 1900's who could have possibly beaten Mike down.
Please also note that nowhere in this thread have I suggested that Bruce would "win".
Thank you and good day.
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
Once the argument is "well it would never happen anyway" it's over
- 21,834
- 30,531
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
How is it possible for anyone to "lose" in this hypothetical debate we in here channeling our inner 6th grader
we in here channeling our inner 6th grader
Last edited:
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
How is it possible for anyone to "lose" in this hypothetical debate
Basically if you've run out of proof to combat a point someone has made OR your argument becomes nothing but questioning the initial question you "lose".
Last edited:
- 22,843
- 29,555
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2003
A fight who's possible outcome still comes down to.....speculation.
But you "don't do the speculation ****".
Yet you're in a thread about Mike Tyson vs. someone who isn't even alive.
If you "won".....then I'm good
Last edited:
- 21,834
- 30,531
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Real talk I would body kimbo slice at a bar. Pretend to be a fan, buy him a beer. Drop 3 Xanax in said beer. And once he starts to doze off give him that quick 3 piece.
- 40,507
- 41,283
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
The other thing about lees kicks, powerful kicks render you very open for a counter if you miss.
*waits for* lee never misses
Because Tyson always dodges..
- 22,843
- 29,555
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2003
Dude really went back and edited too.
There is your "winner" ladies and gentlemen
There is your "winner" ladies and gentlemen
- 4,139
- 827
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
Ben Saunders won his fights using MMA and not jeet kune do. please show me one example of him using jeet kune do. ive never seen him use stupid **** like sticky punches, trapping or useless TMA kicks; he utilized traditional MMA(ie boxing, muay thai, wrestling and BJJ) to win his fights.at dudes posting old *** UFC vids of grappler vs. Wing Chun in a thread about boxer vs. JKD. The whole point of JKD was that Wing Chun was limited.
Ben Saunders beat a BJJ Black Belt once. AMAZING!
The reeeeeeeaching sometimes is too much.
Jeet kune do, wing chun and other gimmick martial arts are TRASH and bruce lee started realizing it later in his life. in his book the tao of jeet kune do he wrote -
""Someone with only a year of training in boxing and wrestling could easily defeat a martial artist of twenty years experience."
--Bruce Lee
in my opinion what we see now in MMA is the vision that bruce lee had for jeet kune do, but he died and it got watered down by garbage, USELESS traditional martial arts.
Last edited:
- 4,139
- 827
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
he was a philosopher and the fact that he could come to that realization after spending his life training wing chun impresses me. most traditional martial artists are stubborn and refuse to believe that what theyve spent so long doing is useless when applied to real situations.
that's why the first UFC was awesome. it filtered out and EXPOSED all the useless, bull!@#$ arts and only kept the effective ones. eventually things kept evolving and were at where were at currently. like joe rogan said "martial arts has evolved more in the last 20 years than it did in the last thousands"
that's why the first UFC was awesome. it filtered out and EXPOSED all the useless, bull!@#$ arts and only kept the effective ones. eventually things kept evolving and were at where were at currently. like joe rogan said "martial arts has evolved more in the last 20 years than it did in the last thousands"
Last edited:
- 40,507
- 41,283
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
This guy sounded like more a philosopher and a student of fighting techniques than an actual fighter.
I'm not even saying he wasn't a real fighter but if people are going to call him the greatest and keep comparing him to greats, I need more than books.
I could fly to the moon in the morning, doesn't mean I can, doesn't mean I will...
- 4,139
- 827
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
he was right tho and it's been proven a million times now thanks to the UFC. bravo bruce lee.
- 40,507
- 41,283
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
What does that have to do with Lee or Tyson?
What killing me is how you guys are BLATANTLY parading your lack of knowledge of Bruce Lee trying to make an argument. Of course you'd think Tyson would win if thats all you know.
What killing me is how you guys are BLATANTLY parading your lack of knowledge of Bruce Lee trying to make an argument. Of course you'd think Tyson would win if thats all you know.
- 13,562
- 9,550
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2012
Bruce had some decent movies.
Mike>
Mike>
- 4,139
- 827
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
Last edited:
- 40,507
- 41,283
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
Enlighten us on Lee's spectacular fighting victories. Please don't post what others "saw what happened"
my point exactly...
- 40,507
- 41,283
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
Under your logic I guess the 1903 world series never happened?
- 29,085
- 27,427
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
Did this dude just post a video of some old fraud comparing him to the gawd Bruce Lee.
