- 3,103
- 6,662
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
- 3,767
- 3,600
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2013
Boy what?
- 12
- 21
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
Anyone get their 3.26 pairs yet?
Last edited:
- 18,810
- 18,865
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
I don't think anybody's has shipped yet. Most of the pictures in here are raffle winners I believe. Mine haven't budged off of the "started" screen.
- 2,043
- 1,740
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
Returned the Pure Plaitnums in a 12.5 to my local Nike Outlet. If the Vapor Max is about to go deep with color options, I'll wait until I see something I like and try a 13 instead to see if that alleviates some of the issues I was having. For now, that's $200 saved.
Last edited:
- 18,810
- 18,865
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
Yeah, I feel the same way. A local shop is releasing the OG's tomorrow... I talked myself out of picking them up. I think the colorway is nice, but there is probably better out there.
- 12,891
- 24,599
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2011
i am actually going the other way on those MC iDs. not liking them as much as i originally thought i would. especially not for 270 tax included
- 298
- 595
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2016
Waiting and waiting for my triple black to arrive, hrrrmph.
I'm wearing the plats daily and even grabbed my Wife a very cute size 3.5...we don't do the matchy-matchy-couple thing so I need the blacks to mix it up.
I'm wearing the plats daily and even grabbed my Wife a very cute size 3.5...we don't do the matchy-matchy-couple thing so I need the blacks to mix it up.
- 689
- 677
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- 2,043
- 1,740
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
3.5? Is she a child bride
- 3,000
- 2,060
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015
SNKRS showing 12.5 available in OG colorway.
- 689
- 677
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
Well, according to Google size 3,5 is the average shoe size of a 9 year old girl.
- 298
- 595
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2016
- 1,136
- 1,035
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2015
I have a sz 11 plat if anyone is interested
Retail+Tax+Shipping
Retail+Tax+Shipping
- 191
- 67
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
A friend had sent me a link, I believe Kicks Deals Canada also tweeted something out so I pulled the trigger....Though it was $305 CAD after taxes (Plats were $28
.
- 5,067
- 1,133
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
anyone miss out on size 11 OGs hit me up.
11.5 is a way much better fit for me.
11.5 is a way much better fit for me.
- 3,767
- 3,600
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2013
Oh it wouldn't even let me go to the site...A friend had sent me a link, I believe Kicks Deals Canada also tweeted something out so I pulled the trigger....Though it was $305 CAD after taxes (Plats were $28
- 614
- 276
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2016
Negative. I'm pretty patient but waiting for this shoe is killing me haha, especially when I keep seeing ppl rocking their platinum pairs in Manhattan..
- 18,810
- 18,865
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
For those trying to find the OGs, fice gallery has them. I'm not sure if they ship out of state, but the are taking phone orders.
- 6,794
- 13,729
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2012
OG 10.5 oop
- 3,103
- 6,662
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
Thought I'd share. Close to 10 miles in running (20-25 miles combined if considering all the walking I do in these), and this is how the shoes' soles are looking so far. SPOILER ALERT: it ain't pretty.
It's taken 6.5 miles on dry surfaces, and another 3.25 in wet surfaces (rained overnight and again right after I finished running.) It's also fogging up, too, if you take a look at the airbags.
View media item 2397169View media item 2397170View media item 2397171
You see the very toned brown-green color of one of the rubber traction pods on the sole? That's actually all the rubber dragged up to the edge. It's a high-wear zone as predicted by Nike when they were testing it, and it's flattening and roll its way up to the edges.
The upper though? Still looks perfectly fine!
I changed the laces before the 3rd run, so it's not the original laces on there.
View media item 2397195
The testing continues! I won't be the only one reviewing these; someone else here said he's also just purely running in these, so be on the lookout for his thoughts and opinions, too, as he'll have lots of mileage on it while I'll simply have "some mileage" on 'em.
Apologies for my dog's rear being in some of the pictures
It's taken 6.5 miles on dry surfaces, and another 3.25 in wet surfaces (rained overnight and again right after I finished running.) It's also fogging up, too, if you take a look at the airbags.
View media item 2397169View media item 2397170View media item 2397171
You see the very toned brown-green color of one of the rubber traction pods on the sole? That's actually all the rubber dragged up to the edge. It's a high-wear zone as predicted by Nike when they were testing it, and it's flattening and roll its way up to the edges.
The upper though? Still looks perfectly fine!
I changed the laces before the 3rd run, so it's not the original laces on there.View media item 2397195
The testing continues! I won't be the only one reviewing these; someone else here said he's also just purely running in these, so be on the lookout for his thoughts and opinions, too, as he'll have lots of mileage on it while I'll simply have "some mileage" on 'em.
Apologies for my dog's rear being in some of the pictures
Last edited:
- 27
- 20
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
Looks pretty good to me. Who's looking at the bottoms of your shoes anyway. Pleasantly surprised how clean your uppers are looking, love those laces too
- 3,103
- 6,662
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
Yeah, it's not bad! I'm really showcasing the Air units and the fogging happening inside, if anything. I'm surprised, too; I'm running on some dirt and sand surfaces, too!
jaycruz.
formerly xjumpman23x
- 2,161
- 1,078
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2005
Those look clean, good news
- 6,794
- 13,729
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2012
Royal 1s tho...
Last edited:
