Originally Posted by reigndrop
I'm not a constitution lawyer either, but look up Article 1 Section 10 and the Federalist Papers 9, 10. While the late Federalist Papers we're against the Bill of Rights, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights should be held in high regards because it protects our civil liberties.Originally Posted by cguy610
The Constitution is an old document that needed to be amended many many times. I'm not a constitutional law expert, so what is it about the Federal income taxes and taxes on bonuses that make it unconstitutional?
I'll admit, I don't hold the Constitution in high regard because it was originally written to exclude certain people.
Top executives are already required by the SEC to disclose their compensation. Making all the names of everyone who took bonuses should be illegal, however executives that normally publicize their compensation should disclose exactly how much compensation came from bonuses.
Reigndrop, that is my mistake. When I hear people(most Republicans) talk about the original Constitution, it is usually in reference to repealing those civilliberties in the Bill of Rights and reverting to states rights and taking this country back in time over 100 years. I don't hold documents that only gaverights to specific people in high regard. I hold the current version of the Constitution in high regard. Perhaps in this instance I misundertood the originalintent.
I looked at article 10. I think at a 90% tax rate that virtually takes away the entire bonus, yes that would violate Article 10. However at 50%-70%, I thinkit gets quite tricky. I don't expect the current 90% tax bill to pass.