- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
D-Rex hybrid =
Human x Dino
Human x Dino
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
"Hold on to your butts......"it will be a hybrid t-rex with the head of Samuel L. Jackson
And out of all the dinosaurs to mix breeds with to create a new dinosaur they chose a t-rex? Lets start off with the most dangerous one, just to start off. How does that seem like a good idea? I get that it makes sense for the movie's plot but damn.Tamed dinosaurs doesnt bother me. I mean, they are in pretty much a zoo.
It's the genetic dinosaur. Real life dinosaurs out there like king of gore and you come up with crap like that? Still dont know what the genetic dinosaur is or the story so I'll hold judgement.. But if it's out there like Predator/Alien....
Oh word? I didn't see that.D-Rex hybrid =
Human x Dino
Tamed dinosaurs doesnt bother me. I mean, they are in pretty much a zoo.
It's the genetic dinosaur. Real life dinosaurs out there like king of gore and you come up with crap like that? Still dont know what the genetic dinosaur is or the story so I'll hold judgement.. But if it's out there like Predator/Alien....
Huh? Part 1 had dinsoaurs that existed. This is a made up one. Thought my king of gore example was pretty obvious what I meant.Tamed dinosaurs doesnt bother me. I mean, they are in pretty much a zoo.
It's the genetic dinosaur. Real life dinosaurs out there like king of gore and you come up with crap like that? Still dont know what the genetic dinosaur is or the story so I'll hold judgement.. But if it's out there like Predator/Alien....
So, you're bothered by the idea of creating a new dinosaur in a lab, but still totally cool with the premise of the original story? Which is, you know, creating dinosaurs in a lab lol. Of all the criticisms to have, this is flat-out the weakest one. This is really just the evolution of the original concept. Hell, the idea of tamed dinosaurs is more preposterous at this point than creating a new species in a lab lol.
Now, whether or not it's executed well is another story.
All the dinosaurs were "genetic", remember they were designed to be female, and less aggressive, but they used amphibian and reptile DNA. Biology 101, some amphibians and reptiles can change sex at will to produce offspring.It's the genetic dinosaur.
I'm calling it now, the hybrid will be the "ultimate" Dinosaur mix.. probably gonna be a huge bad*ss T-Rex, but with the horns of Triceratops and some kind of super tough armour like Ankylosaurus
True. I guess technically it's still the same thing as part 1. Word is they made one up for patent reasons.All the dinosaurs were "genetic", remember they were designed to be female, and less aggressive, but they used amphibian and reptile DNA. Biology 101, some amphibians and reptiles can change sex at will to produce offspring.
...So all the dinosaurs on the park are "genetic", or what I believe you meant to say genetically engineered. But just like Malcolm said in the first film, you can not contain evolution.
I feel what you're saying though, I don't want the Alien vs Predator feel it neither. I just want a sound explanation for their splicing or the movie will probably suck.True. I guess technically it's still the same thing as part 1. Word is they made one up for patent reasons.
Huh? Part 1 had dinsoaurs that existed. This is a made up one. Thought my king of gore example was pretty obvious what I meant.
And yes. Tamed dinosaurs is preposterous yet we have lions, gorillas, aligators, and tigers in zoos right now lol
So is this years and years after things went bad or like an alternate universe?
I must be one of the few that was a little disappointed in the trailer
I expected more :\