- 57,304
- 60,631
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
They sho aint arguing about the bullet at the top of his head that matches vetically with the wound on his chin.
Police Kill Unarmed Teen In Ferguson, Missouri
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by da shoefreak,
- Start date
- 8,416
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
dudes are really disputing the autopsy that was actually done by them
lets not forget the fact the family personally had them do it
yall hell bro
straight EMOTIONAL
this is the doctor hired by the family....but he's too emotional to hear it
- 10,249
- 6,648
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
when black people got together in groups and "became a threat" by "rioting"
- 4,263
- 4,289
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
- 8,416
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
the wound details gives us an idea of what position he was really in when he was shot
no one was really arguing, they were going off of 2nd and 3rd party accounts of the autopsy instead watching the doctor than done the autopsy explain it himself
- 773
- 517
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2014
Yay for more looting (in the next town over now)
http://fox2now.com/2014/08/18/business-owners-cleaning-up-after-another-night-of-looting/
- 22,918
- 33,321
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- 5,584
- 974
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2010
people are emotional because this could have easily been them 
- 12,422
- 2,916
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
Quote me saying anything of the sort before you accuse me of the foolishness, direct your anger somewhere else
- 32,830
- 24,896
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
It makes perfect sense if his head is slumped down. It would also allow for the officer to get a clear shot at the top of his skull.
- 4,263
- 4,289
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
anyway though
before I left work today we had it on the press conference with Obama
so did I hear correctly that he is coming down to Ferguson
i was I mistaken
before I left work today we had it on the press conference with Obama
so did I hear correctly that he is coming down to Ferguson
i was I mistaken
- 32,830
- 24,896
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
people are emotional because this could have easily been them
They don't understand and they never will until it's their brother or friend or son
- 12,422
- 2,916
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
Who is trying to justify a murder? Who is ignoring facts? Please enlighten me. Just because someone says he got shot in the head and the eye and the other says he got shot in the head and it went through his eye .. all of a sudden that means someone is justifying murder?
Angry at the world and want to take it out on anybody who doesn't agree with your way of thinking, real immature.
- 5,132
- 843
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2003
For when you watch CNN, MSNBC, or FOX News
- 8,416
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
people are emotional because this could have easily been them
so emotional that you'd argue with evidence that works in your favor?
how smart is that?
- 10,249
- 6,648
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
ur saying this without really thinking. make a straight line from your eyebrow...thru your cheek... through your jaw, to your collarbone. just cant happen. your eyebrow would have to be the furthest poking spot on your head then your cheek, then your jaw would have to be a block.
the alternative would be if you had your chin tucked (head all the way down) then the shot becomes easier to believe. but still, those points wouldnt line up correctly without great effort
- 6,505
- 4,249
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
Dr. Baden said the bullet that entered the top of MB head stayed in. The bullet that went in around the eye, exited the collarbone.
- 4,263
- 4,289
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
and only in there favor
the Dr could have said that one bullet made all those wounds on his body
but if he followed it with
the officer sitting on mike brown chest spitting on him the shooting him they would have not disputed it one bit
- 10,249
- 6,648
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
ive been saying this to people irl and they dont get it. an embarrassingly large amount of white people believe that racism really is gone and is a figment of our imaginations now. they dont understand we're not just playing the victim. they think its exaggerations when we tell them stories. i remember that vine of the black kid in the gas station showing the lady following him everywhere and white people were astonished when alot of us said it happens ALL THE TIME. they really dont know. theyre not stupid, theyre ignorant of it.
- 5,584
- 974
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2010
eye to jaw then exit through collarbone is how i understood it
- 12,422
- 2,916
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
people are emotional because this could have easily been them
so emotional that you'd argue with evidence that works in your favor?
how smart is that?
at this point I don't even think they're reading anything, just angry mob
everything is nothing justifies getting shot 6 times, when no one is trying to justify that
we've already established that part, are we allowed to give a opinion on anything else?we can't even discuss a autopsy and share possible positions MB was standing without getting accused of protecting a killer or trying to justify a murder
damn
- 10,249
- 6,648
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
now this makes sense. all im saying is he HAD to have been shot in the head twice. some people in here are arguing it was one shot that had entry and reentry and exit wounds like that. theres no way possible.
- 22,918
- 33,321
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
but yall ain't arguing though
- 1,051
- 298
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2014
tbh it doesnt.... but i cant speak on a certainty. because i wasnt there but he clearly was not properly trained or just didnt care if he was suppose to be shooting at center mass which i believe by definition is slightly different then military standards.. One we well suppose to account for every shot and give a report as for each shot. The penetrating point, and why was it a need.
Also there is this zone to which i forget exactly how close of the torso and the collar section we are suppose to shoot. but it is a i believe a 30 inch radius... i dont believe this applies to officers of the law.
Also we arent authorize to draw weapons unless the persons has a weapon and the range of motion aka aim is in out direction (many ppl well in the sands land aka afganistan are allowed to carry ak-47's)
But gsr is a bit tricky, the residue depending on a various amount of factors can vary such as trajectory of shot, wind velocity, weather conditions, the type of clothing/garments the individual is wearing, inertia of force of the individual who is shooting and/or the person shot movement.
its all tricky and often times we have to beheld accountable and liable for said factors or face the U.S.M.J.
those same standards should apply to officers. Hey as a person who tried to uphold the perils of right and wrong from a judicial and moral implication i understand and have empathy for police officers. i just dont like a "hey you past with a 75% rate in a 20 hr course in shooting to which most is at a range that makes you qualified" aspect that most state jurisdictions accept as qualified to be a officer.
- 4,263
- 4,289
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
