Originally Posted by EZLN1
I'm still undecided about this stadium and proposed move.
The 9ers stadium has been long overdue, but I still hope that this can be done in SF.
This is a world class city, and I find it hard to accept a move to Santa Clara.
More than that, if there ever was a region that NEEDS this redevelopment plan, both for what it means economically and socially (with regards to being re-integrated into the city as a whole) it is Hunter's Point. Aside from that, it will help further re-develop vis valley, and portola, the surrounding areas near HP.
This stadium and plan has been dangled to the residents of HP for what now seems like decades, only for nothing to come to fruition....broken promises in other words.
BART needs a direct line there.
Sorry but the city of SF has done NOTHING to help the 49ers. The team tried, and all the city has done is talk. The team even had to sue the city to maintain Candlestick (which it is obligated to do). I love SF but the Hunters Point plan is NOT going to work out. Carmen Policy said that a bridge and more infrastructure needed to be built just for traffic in that area. It's not going to happen. I would have loved for the 49ers to have stayed in the city but the city turned it's back on the team it's greatly benefited from. At the end of the day, this plan keeps the team in the bay and makes the most sense.Originally Posted by EZLN1
I'm still undecided about this stadium and proposed move.
The 9ers stadium has been long overdue, but I still hope that this can be done in SF.
This is a world class city, and I find it hard to accept a move to Santa Clara.
More than that, if there ever was a region that NEEDS this redevelopment plan, both for what it means economically and socially (with regards to being re-integrated into the city as a whole) it is Hunter's Point. Aside from that, it will help further re-develop vis valley, and portola, the surrounding areas near HP.
This stadium and plan has been dangled to the residents of HP for what now seems like decades, only for nothing to come to fruition....broken promises in other words.
If it got voted down then everything shut down and Santa Clara is out of the picture. With the yes vote in, plans can move forward but still lots of roadblocks to be cleared before they start breaking ground.
Exactly how I feel and I really hope this ends up happening.Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Sorry but the city of SF has done NOTHING to help the 49ers. The team tried, and all the city has done is talk. The team even had to sue the city to maintain Candlestick (which it is obligated to do). I love SF but the Hunters Point plan is NOT going to work out. Carmen Policy said that a bridge and more infrastructure needed to be built just for traffic in that area. It's not going to happen. I would have loved for the 49ers to have stayed in the city but the city turned it's back on the team it's greatly benefited from. At the end of the day, this plan keeps the team in the bay and makes the most sense.Originally Posted by EZLN1
I'm still undecided about this stadium and proposed move.
The 9ers stadium has been long overdue, but I still hope that this can be done in SF.
This is a world class city, and I find it hard to accept a move to Santa Clara.
More than that, if there ever was a region that NEEDS this redevelopment plan, both for what it means economically and socially (with regards to being re-integrated into the city as a whole) it is Hunter's Point. Aside from that, it will help further re-develop vis valley, and portola, the surrounding areas near HP.
This stadium and plan has been dangled to the residents of HP for what now seems like decades, only for nothing to come to fruition....broken promises in other words.
