The Air Jordan XVI returns in 2016

I remember in the 2002 Super Bowl, some of the players from the rams were wearing the ginger 16’s.
E04C0752-002E-4968-9CD9-40CEDDE1490D.jpeg
 
Here's a question for some of the older members, and I don't know if there is an answer. Starting with the 16, why were there significantly different versions of the same model? You had the base 16 then the 16+. On top of that, the lows were very different besides the sole and midsole. This continued with the 17 +, 18.5, and 19 se. The lows fore the 17 and 18 were fairly consistent with their mid counter parts as much as they could have been since the mids both had gaudy shrouds. The 19 low was almost a completely different shoe!
 
Here's a question for some of the older members, and I don't know if there is an answer. Starting with the 16, why were there significantly different versions of the same model? You had the base 16 then the 16+. On top of that, the lows were very different besides the sole and midsole. This continued with the 17 +, 18.5, and 19 se. The lows fore the 17 and 18 were fairly consistent with their mid counter parts as much as they could have been since the mids both had gaudy shrouds. The 19 low was almost a completely different shoe!
You probably won’t get a firm answer. My guess is they were simply trying to grow the brand. MJ wasn’t out there every day wearing the current mainline model and supporting the sales. Instead they had lots of Jordan brand athletes, so it made sense to have a variety of different models out there.
 
You probably won’t get a firm answer. My guess is they were simply trying to grow the brand. MJ wasn’t out there every day wearing the current mainline model and supporting the sales. Instead they had lots of Jordan brand athletes, so it made sense to have a variety of different models out there.
That makes sense. I remember seeing the xvi for the first time during the dunk competition that year. Was amazed at how good they looked. Keep in mind I had recently gotten the space jams for Christmas and these were that great. I had the cherry wood pair as well, no where near as nice as the black and red or the navy pair. The gingers were one of the worst colorways released by jb at that time. I wish the white and black + samples released. Those would have given the regular xvis a run for their money. There's alot that can be done with the model, hope to get new colorways and a proper black red retro.
 
Last edited:
Here's a question for some of the older members, and I don't know if there is an answer. Starting with the 16, why were there significantly different versions of the same model? You had the base 16 then the 16+. On top of that, the lows were very different besides the sole and midsole. This continued with the 17 +, 18.5, and 19 se. The lows fore the 17 and 18 were fairly consistent with their mid counter parts as much as they could have been since the mids both had gaudy shrouds. The 19 low was almost a completely different shoe!
I don’t recall there being any official statement, but I believe the intention was to strip the model down a bit and move it further toward the performance end of the spectrum than the standard model.
 
22s underrated fa sho
XX and XXI too which is on todays anniversaries.

I High Silver Toe (W) (1 Year)
1645192212741.jpeg

I Low Black Metallic Silver (1 Year)
1645192282837.jpeg

I High Chameleon (5 Years)
1645192330704.jpeg

VI Chameleon (5 Years)
1645192496866.jpeg

XIII Cherry (Retro) (5 Years)
1645192537269.jpeg

XXXI Chameleon (5 Years)
1645192453403.jpeg

XX9 Year of the Goat (7 Years)
1645503560942.jpeg

IV White Cement (Retro) (10 Years)
1645193284480.jpeg

XXI White Varsity Red (16 Years)
1645192658688.jpeg

XX White Varsity Red (17 Years)
1645192603060.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom