- Aug 26, 2012
- 3,733
- 5,139
12/2014 Air Jordan 11 Retro - White/Black-Legend Blue - 378037-117 NO GM TALK ALLOWED!
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by rupertpupkin,
- Start date
bannedwoodro
Banned
- Mar 15, 2014
- 190
- 27
cant wait, soles off but doesnt bother me a whole lot
quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
oh ok i was confused as hell lol
wait so pantones are coming as a pack then ... damn
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,096
- 8,644
Yeah with the xx9s for $500oh ok i was confused as hell lol
wait so pantones are coming as a pack then ... damn
- Aug 26, 2012
- 3,733
- 5,139
oh ok i was confused as hell lol
wait so pantones are coming as a pack then ... damn
- Feb 11, 2013
- 5,941
- 1,296
Basically they are just seeing if people are thirsty enough to shellout 250 for an 11 while simultaneously forcing the new sig on them for full price. and the sheep will pay
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,096
- 8,644
Basically I would've bought the 11s but that $500 is too expensive especially with all the other releases in the holiday. Would rather put that $500 on better stuff than a forced pack for 1 shoe I really likeBasically they are just seeing if people are thirsty enough to shellout 250 for an 11 while simultaneously forcing the new sig on them for full price. and the sheep will pay
- Feb 11, 2013
- 5,941
- 1,296
if this goes well I can see this becoming a trend with the new sigs. easy way for them to grind out some extra sales of the new model that may not have otherwise been there, or at least not at full retail price.
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,547
- 79,924
these jumpans dont seem to be displaced? is it just the angle?
- Jun 6, 2003
- 983
- 1,088
23's look off as well
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,096
- 8,644
The shape of the left shoe seems really off just by looking at the sole and the shape of the back of the shoe idk of it's just me or not
- Oct 18, 2014
- 263
- 92
what if i like the 29's a lot, too
Basically they are just seeing if people are thirsty enough to shellout 250 for an 11 while simultaneously forcing the new sig on them for full price. and the sheep will pay
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,464
- 33,528
- Jan 5, 2013
- 23,607
- 38,409
Retail or bust.
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,551
- 33,371
What's the biggest gs size? I'm gonna try to squeeze into a 6Y so I can get that og treatment
- Feb 6, 2011
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,551
- 33,371
I'm goin for the 7Y
Last edited:
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,551
- 33,371
Even tho I wear a men's 13.5
- Mar 12, 2013
- 5,095
- 13,937
Look good to me toothese look good to me
but what do i know
- Mar 30, 2004
- 12,401
- 4,803
Unless my memory is clouded the GS soles don't look anything like the OGs. It's too dark. The color on those official pics of the men's size looks pretty spot on to me.
Last edited:
- Aug 26, 2012
- 3,733
- 5,139
- Jan 5, 2011
- 68,547
- 79,924
just copped my 11.5. Should be here in the next couple days. Will post hella pix when they arrive. A little extra to have em early, I'm down for that. They look like every pic I've seen thus far of legit pairs. They said they're 100% legit and have a good rep. Purchased through paypal, and screen printed the page stating the authenticity. so if they end up fugazi, I'll just file and get my dough back.
Last edited:
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,551
- 33,371
You're right. I like that look better than the og. The men's pair is not og either tho
Last edited:
bravelude
Banned
- Dec 29, 2013
- 7,573
- 1,115
them TROLL TOE TOE BOX extension lolNot fairJB trolling hard on this one. Oh well. I'm happy for the women and children and baby feet ****** out there
- Jan 5, 2013
- 23,607
- 38,409
The pics we got a few weeks back from the warehouse leak looks different. I'm still hoping for those soles. Maybe it's the filter used in the official pictures that makes the soles look lighter.
