48÷2(9+3) = ???

Originally Posted by MECKS

Originally Posted by Mo Greene

Originally Posted by MECKS

solve 15+3(2x1)

like i said a(b+c0 DOES = ab+ac but in an equation such as above you have to consider it as (ab+ac)
(my bad with the typo above i just realized i put " b " where the a should be )



The distributive property is handy to help you get rid of parentheses
a(b + c) = ab + ac

http://math.about.com/od/algebra/a/distributive.htm


Solve the equation. Dude. U quoting things that are irrelevant .
not sure what your point is, but i'll solve it...using PEMDAS.

solve 15+3(2x1)

parenthesis first

15 + 3(2)

then multiplication

15 + 6

then addition

15 + 6 = 21.

still trying to figure out your point...you use PEMDAS in this problem, just like you use it in every other problem. again, the 'distributive property' does not apply to problems that do not involve variables. in problems with strictly numbers, you solve the terms in the parenthesis first before following the order of operations in the correct order (from left to right)--no need to distribute here.

carry on folks...team 288
pimp.gif


-waystinthyme

  
 
Originally Posted by MECKS

Originally Posted by Mo Greene

Originally Posted by MECKS

solve 15+3(2x1)

like i said a(b+c0 DOES = ab+ac but in an equation such as above you have to consider it as (ab+ac)
(my bad with the typo above i just realized i put " b " where the a should be )



The distributive property is handy to help you get rid of parentheses
a(b + c) = ab + ac

http://math.about.com/od/algebra/a/distributive.htm


Solve the equation. Dude. U quoting things that are irrelevant .
not sure what your point is, but i'll solve it...using PEMDAS.

solve 15+3(2x1)

parenthesis first

15 + 3(2)

then multiplication

15 + 6

then addition

15 + 6 = 21.

still trying to figure out your point...you use PEMDAS in this problem, just like you use it in every other problem. again, the 'distributive property' does not apply to problems that do not involve variables. in problems with strictly numbers, you solve the terms in the parenthesis first before following the order of operations in the correct order (from left to right)--no need to distribute here.

carry on folks...team 288
pimp.gif


-waystinthyme

  
 
Originally Posted by MzD650

Did team 2 give up yet?

I believe they have, but no one from team 2 has officially conceded defeat.
crux?  do work son?  balloonoboy?

would any of you guys like to do the honors?
 
Originally Posted by MzD650

Did team 2 give up yet?

I believe they have, but no one from team 2 has officially conceded defeat.
crux?  do work son?  balloonoboy?

would any of you guys like to do the honors?
 
the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.
 
the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.
 
Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

but no one ever said the parentheses need to disappear before going forward with the equation
 
Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

but no one ever said the parentheses need to disappear before going forward with the equation
 
Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

so you are saying (12) doesnt equal to 12? The parenthesis is removed by simplifying as seen here:

http://www.themathpage.com/alg/parentheses.htm

The parenthesis from this point only shows the juxtaposition of the terms which indicates multiplication. People are trying to argue that juxtaposed terms are supposed to be calculate first but there is no proof of this online saying they would void normal order of operation.
 
Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

so you are saying (12) doesnt equal to 12? The parenthesis is removed by simplifying as seen here:

http://www.themathpage.com/alg/parentheses.htm

The parenthesis from this point only shows the juxtaposition of the terms which indicates multiplication. People are trying to argue that juxtaposed terms are supposed to be calculate first but there is no proof of this online saying they would void normal order of operation.
 
Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

After the addition, the parenthesis doesnt disappear.....it represents multiplication.  Simple.
 
Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

After the addition, the parenthesis doesnt disappear.....it represents multiplication.  Simple.
 
Originally Posted by MzD650

Originally Posted by willsndvl

the answer is 2, though. i'm still wondering why you people with subpar math skills aren't getting rid of the parentheses before moving on. the addition alone doesn't make the parentheses disappear.

After the addition, the parenthesis doesnt disappear.....it represents multiplication.  Simple.
2jdgodv.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom