- 548
- 37
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
Sorry if already answered but if I'm a size 9.5 normally should I go for 9.5 or a 9 for the Boost 750 (or something else)?
ADIDAS BOOST Thread - PAGE 1 for INFO- *NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING*
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by jpac,
- Start date
- 2,167
- 1,118
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
10s across the board. Thats how you know it was OGs.. bought them NMDs before anyone knew PK was stretchy AF. LOL
Yea man... I wear Diadora mostly, and Boost the other times.
- 4,103
- 1,518
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
My size
- 86
- 89
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2014
what up y'all, got a quick question. I'm trying to get a relative on the UB train but they have wide feet so when they tried it on they complained that they didn't think the knit would stretch enough to accommodate their wide feet over time and it was kind of tight
..can anyone with wide feet say that the ultra boost was comfie for them over time? or are they better off with a different shoe w/ boost
..can anyone with wide feet say that the ultra boost was comfie for them over time? or are they better off with a different shoe w/ boost
- 5,807
- 1,338
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2016
Yeah, I wear mostly boost and my asics...
Why does it have to be my size... Your shoes... lol
- 942
- 546
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
It will loosen up a little, but not a drastic change. I removed the insoles from mine which helped a lot, and I also stretch my out manually using a glass jar to help with the tight ankle opening. Obviously most non-sneakerheads don't want to deal with this kind of stuff. One option would be the UB ST which has a traditional tongue rather than sock opening and can be adjusted for a looser fit.
- 119
- 17
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2016
- 999
- 356
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
12.5 Gray Wools sitting on the Bay for a reasonable price, could probably PM the seller.
- 1,429
- 907
- Joined
- May 21, 2016
Damn you!!!
Where did you get those laces? I got some 3M whites for my 2.0s but the 3M is too dark for my taste.
Last edited:
- 3,155
- 1,560
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
Not my pic. I should say that more often.
- 5,171
- 15,874
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
Everyone's situation is different. But I will say (tongue in cheek) that you're never really out. You just go dormant/into hibernation. (was my case, for years prior to returning to it)
Boost is certainly a big component in stoking that flame for me right now though.
Last edited:
- 5,850
- 2,770
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2016
Rope lace supply for the cream and wools. Lace lab for the royals.
- 25
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2016
Trying to buy a pair of core blacks. Any thoughts on which one I should buy (1.0 vs 2.0)?
- 5,807
- 1,338
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2016
Most will say 1.0... Really depends on you... You can get 2.0 for retail but you would have to hunt down 1.0 if you go that route...
- 699
- 252
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
Whichever one you like more.
That being said I see nothing wrong with the knit pattern on the 2.0, it's different but not bad.
- 1,855
- 112
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
size 7.5 and size 8 solar yellows on jackrabbit, 153 + 10 off
- 24,441
- 22,116
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
Just got my core black 1.0s in...wow. best shoe out without a doubt. Now waiting for white 1.0s to come in later in the week. I'm curious how the 2.0 and the uncaged fit in comparison because these 1.0s are an amazing fit in my TTS.
- 536
- 251
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
I would say the 1.0s are more aesthetically pleasing and look better overall, but I appreciate the performance upgrades in the 2.0 with the new pattern (more breathable vamp), updated fit, full Primeknit upper and Continental outsole. Having said that, it comes down to whichever one you like the look of more.
Last edited:
- 6,955
- 3,659
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2015
from what i've seen, the general consensus seems to be that the CB 1.0's and OG Whites fit a little more tight compared to the 2.0's.
but since TTS is an amazing fit for you, you should be good across the board for others by staying TTS. no idea about the upcoming uncaged socks though.
- 2,524
- 535
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
It's the nature of the sneaker. It's made for running. It WILL be snug and needs time to break in and even then it will still fit you like a glove which some people need to get used to or just won't like altogether. Also UB fit different depending on the color way.
My foot is wider than whoever you're referring to, trust me. And my core black 1.0 fit great but it I went up .5 and it took a few wears to break them in.
Now my 1.0 whites still need time to break in (2 short wears) but for the moment I am almost forced to take out the insoles because they are much more snug than my core blacks were when I got them. I would rather not have to remove the insoles tbh. They feel a bit more like the NMD when you take the insoles out to me. Which is still fine but just a shame IMO.
- 453
- 153
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
I see so many comments/questions regarding the knit change on the 2.0. The primary reason Adidas changed the knit pattern is because it gives them a knitting pattern that works perfectly with multiple colors, patterns and gradient color schemes. If you apply color stripping to the 1.0 pattern it looks out of place-if you apply a gradient color pattern to the 2.0 if aligns perfectly with the exsiting knitting pattern-looks fluid. All these different color ways and patterns mean more new releases and that equals more cash. The 1.0 knit pattern only works with tonal CWs.
- 2,524
- 535
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
lol if u say so
- 942
- 546
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
Maybe but of all the new gradients, the tonal ones are the only ones selling while the colorful ones are sitting on shelves. Not saying you're wrong but if that was the plan it was a dumb one. And given that the 2017's ditch the gradient, it seems that Adidas realizes that.
- 2,524
- 535
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
Yup.
- 74
- 13
- Joined
- May 16, 2016
Couple weeks ago, when y'all were getting steals on the Y3 on matches.... how much did it end up costing?
