- 131
- 55
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
Originally Posted by JIM SHADY2003
Originally Posted by UPandCOMING32
you do realize RETROS are never EXACT compared to OGs...people itch and moan every release. same story every time...go spend $500+ for an OG pair that will probably crumble/fall apart on you...Ill take a retro colroway even if its not EXACTLY like OGsOriginally Posted by jumpman cbt2
you either are too young to know that the OG's had black midsoles or just overlooked that the sample pic
by MN shows a AJ "Chicago X" with white midsole.
JB is really messing good chances to increase its sales by ruining classic colorways
you can go down the line of retros that are not EXACTLY like OGs.... cement 3s, flint 13s, metallic Vs, cardinal VII, Olympic VII, concords, etc. etc. etc. and they still sell.....
face the FACTS...we will NEVER see a RETRO being an EXACT REPLICA of OGs
be happy (or mad) that you are getting a retro of an OG that has never been made before...people are in for a rude awakening in 2012 if they think retros will look just like OGs
white midsole= 1 pair
if midsole changes to black..then 2 pairs
Putting a 23 on the side and changing the sock liner from solid to checkered should suffice , changing the midsole from black to white in addition to the other changes is just moronic. I collect J's because I'm a native chicagoan and Mj is my all time favorite athlete, it's important to me that jordan brand preserves the basic overall look of a shoe as iconic as this one, he didn't drop 55 at msg in a sneaker with white midsoles
exactly. changing up "minor" details is one thing. changing a huge detail like the midsole, something that's very obvious from afar will make these look like fakes imo. i want a pair of these pretty badly...as long as they stay true to the og colorway. change it to white midsoles and it's an easy pass from me. might as well buy some fake chicagos with the og colorway shipped from china on the cheap...would never do that but just saying.