- 16,089
- 43,670
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2017
Lol, there's a jumpman behind the NA tab on the clear pair
Air Jordan III "Fire Red SE" -August 2020... SE-T too?
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Bert.,
- Start date
ZOMBAVELI THE DON
formerly zombiejesuz
- 2,268
- 1,289
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2016
not gonna be close to ogs im sure
- 12,903
- 11,088
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2014
Like pretty much everyone ITT I hate these stupid Gentry-led changes but, all things considered, if the transparent tab is all they did to these, that really isn’t as bad as it could have been (I.e. Jumpman Tab again). Sad our expectations have to be so low in the 1st place though...
msu313green
Supporter
- 281
- 451
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2012
I didn't need....these. Ugh, just give me the originals please.
- 4
- 8
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2019
Pretty sure it’s just an air Jordan 3 fire red with a translucent heel tab and a black outsole compared to the regular cement grey
- 8,946
- 12,478
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
I hope 1 of them is true to the og fire red
- 702
- 152
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
This is the stupidest take on an OG retro I've seen in awhile. I literally have zero idea why anyone would concoct this version. So dumb.
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
Because Gentry is stupid.
- 702
- 152
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
Don't bring that man's name up. LOL I thought I was past Gentry and that era was gone. I've collected for so long and this new era has been pretty darn good compared to that '05-'10 crap that we got.
- 9,654
- 31,021
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2018
- 100
- 190
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
One of the worst concepts I have ever seen, something literally no one has ever or will ever ask for. Pass even for free.
The direction of the brand overall is disturbing.
The direction of the brand overall is disturbing.
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
THIS.
It’s very disturbing. Jordan Brand should have enough pride to make the OG’s they way they were made in the beginning. You can take nothing away from the first run of them.
- 7,493
- 9,298
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2002
Bad, but not as bad as Mars IVs imo
- 5,123
- 7,039
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2018
Those were bad because of the quality not the laser head.
- 32,832
- 24,894
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
Back when Jordan Brand gave you a shirt and a hat on top of quality smh
mr z
Supporter
- 3,056
- 5,326
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
Honestly, I’m coppin whether it’s OG or not....
- 63,610
- 50,738
- Joined
- May 23, 2005
nah theyve had worst concepts
and yall ate it up
this one pretty mild
compared to the other trash folks be eating up
rainking
Supporter
- 8,052
- 17,380
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
J
F
C
I can’t even, man. I can’t even.
F
C
I can’t even, man. I can’t even.
- 304
- 161
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2016
cop for me
- 234
- 170
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2012
If these are just OG's with a different back tab then Im down. Let these had been a "Virgil" pair tho, the energy would've been completely different
- 12,903
- 11,088
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2014
At least Gentry isn’t doing what he did to the poor Foamposites and making Weatherman cws of retro Js....... yet.
- 23,623
- 27,180
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
Nah we just want some OG Fire reds with the new shape that aren’t gonna chip.
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
You‘re right, the Mars IV is the ultimate suckage.
- 2,534
- 4,365
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2016
mars iv and military blue iv were absolute crap. I stopped buying retro jordans after those.
at the time I was super excited after not seeing these colorways in so long but looking back now omg the quality was horrible. although the lasers were much higher quality
Similar threads
