PrinSe3:
^completely and i mean completely different situation. Yes if you look at broadly its
Player retired... comes back
player retired... comes back
Ska your a smart guy it seems, do some further analysis. Consider the different situations, the different legacies, and the time periods of each.
Nah.
"I'm retired. Wait, I change my mind." = "I'm retired. Wait, I change my mind."
But to make it different we should look at the legacies? One was exceptional at his position, the other broke all kinds of top records at his position. The guywho broke all kinds of records is definitely more deserving to change his mind if he wants to. One lead his team to a championship appearance; the other leadhis team to a championship.
Different situations? One retired with teams still wanting him, then retired again with teams still interested, so he came back again. The other has announcedhis [first] retirement... with no employer, after being waived by his previous team (Grizzlies), and being asked to come off the bench by the team before that(Pistons).
"I have a ton of meaningful records and a championship and teams still want me to play, but I'm retiring. Wait... I change my mind." =/= "Iam really, really good at my position and I've been in the championship. I didn't win it, but hey. Apparently no one wants me, so I'm retiring.Wait... I change my mind."
Time periods? I see that as a push. They both played in the same era. Favre started in the early 90s ('91); Iverson started in '96.