Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
I'm sure the Warriors wouldn't make this trade without the understanding about an Amare Stoudeminre contract extension after thisseason... but as far as I'm concerned, Amare could be saying whatever the Warriors want to hear just to get out of Phoenix and still have the intention togo elsewhere in the offseason.
I think Andris just suits the Warriors better. His length, activeness, and defense fit better at the C spot than Amar'e. And the fact that theWarriors would have Amar'e, S-Jax, and Maggette under contract for so long is
No big men whatsoever? I think that's a stretch. Oh, and what's the point of getting Stoudemire if we're giving up 2 bigs to get him(Biedrins and Wright). We lose a big in that deal. Isn't that counter productive?Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
First if they keep Curry, the Warriors are filled with a bunch of guards. Curry, Azubike, Watson, Ellis, Jackson, Belinelli (garbage). They have no big men whatsover. And plus Ellis has ben *****in to staff about the direction they have been going. So they might want to get a star in there while they can or Ellis will be outta there. Warriors are not a hot ticket team to play on so they better wheel and deal b4 we have another 15 year drought. Biedris aint worth 9 million when you have no offensive and always getting beasted by other centers.
Originally Posted by Paul Is All In
No big men whatsoever? I think that's a stretch. Oh, and what's the point of getting Stoudemire if we're giving up 2 bigs to get him (Biedrins and Wright). We lose a big in that deal. Isn't that counter productive?Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
First if they keep Curry, the Warriors are filled with a bunch of guards. Curry, Azubike, Watson, Ellis, Jackson, Belinelli (garbage). They have no big men whatsover. And plus Ellis has ben *****in to staff about the direction they have been going. So they might want to get a star in there while they can or Ellis will be outta there. Warriors are not a hot ticket team to play on so they better wheel and deal b4 we have another 15 year drought. Biedris aint worth 9 million when you have no offensive and always getting beasted by other centers.
Yeah, we know we have guards, but IMO, the guards to get rid of are Azubuike (I can stomach letting him go), Maggette, Jackson, C.J. Watson, Acie Law, and Speedy Claxton. Those are the guys we need to let go. If we need to give up Belinelli, then ok, as long as what we're getting back in return is worthwhile.
Your reasoning doesn't make sense. You say the Warriors are lacking bigs. Ok, I tell you we have bigs. Then you say they get "beasted inthe paint" especially how Wright gets beasted in the paint. Then you bring up Randolph replacing Wright, but what you fail to acknowledge is Randolph isthinner than Wright. OkOriginally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is All In
No big men whatsoever? I think that's a stretch. Oh, and what's the point of getting Stoudemire if we're giving up 2 bigs to get him (Biedrins and Wright). We lose a big in that deal. Isn't that counter productive?Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
First if they keep Curry, the Warriors are filled with a bunch of guards. Curry, Azubike, Watson, Ellis, Jackson, Belinelli (garbage). They have no big men whatsover. And plus Ellis has ben *****in to staff about the direction they have been going. So they might want to get a star in there while they can or Ellis will be outta there. Warriors are not a hot ticket team to play on so they better wheel and deal b4 we have another 15 year drought. Biedris aint worth 9 million when you have no offensive and always getting beasted by other centers.
Yeah, we know we have guards, but IMO, the guards to get rid of are Azubuike (I can stomach letting him go), Maggette, Jackson, C.J. Watson, Acie Law, and Speedy Claxton. Those are the guys we need to let go. If we need to give up Belinelli, then ok, as long as what we're getting back in return is worthwhile.
Wright and Beidrins are always getting beasted in the paint. They are too small play down there. Turaif which is undersized plays harder than Biedris. Wright will be replaced with Randolph
We need this trade because we would unload players that wouldn't even play anyways.Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
Originally Posted by Paul Is All In
Your reasoning doesn't make sense. You say the Warriors are lacking bigs. Ok, I tell you we have bigs. Then you say they get "beasted in the paint" especially how Wright gets beasted in the paint. Then you bring up Randolph replacing Wright, but what you fail to acknowledge is Randolph is thinner than Wright. OkOriginally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is All In
No big men whatsoever? I think that's a stretch. Oh, and what's the point of getting Stoudemire if we're giving up 2 bigs to get him (Biedrins and Wright). We lose a big in that deal. Isn't that counter productive?Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
First if they keep Curry, the Warriors are filled with a bunch of guards. Curry, Azubike, Watson, Ellis, Jackson, Belinelli (garbage). They have no big men whatsover. And plus Ellis has ben *****in to staff about the direction they have been going. So they might want to get a star in there while they can or Ellis will be outta there. Warriors are not a hot ticket team to play on so they better wheel and deal b4 we have another 15 year drought. Biedris aint worth 9 million when you have no offensive and always getting beasted by other centers.
Yeah, we know we have guards, but IMO, the guards to get rid of are Azubuike (I can stomach letting him go), Maggette, Jackson, C.J. Watson, Acie Law, and Speedy Claxton. Those are the guys we need to let go. If we need to give up Belinelli, then ok, as long as what we're getting back in return is worthwhile.
Wright and Beidrins are always getting beasted in the paint. They are too small play down there. Turaif which is undersized plays harder than Biedris. Wright will be replaced with Randolph.
You also are overrating Amare as a center. He's more suited to be a PF in this league. Doesn't that make us still undersized?
When we finally accept the fact that we have talent on the bench that our coach refuses to play, then we have failed as fans. As fans, we want thebest for our team. Accepting that is like giving up to Don Nelson to me. I'll never accept that. I'm going to hate Don Nelson as long as he's herebenching our players that deserve to play.Originally Posted by jeff415finest
We need this trade because we would unload players that wouldn't even play anyways.Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dp) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
The lineup would look like this.
C-Amare
PF-Randolph
SF-Jackson
SG-Ellis
PG-Curry
6th-Maggette
7th-Turiaf
8th-Morrow
9th-Watson
10-Davidson
11-Speedy
12-Law
I mean i understand you guys argument we are giving up alot, but if amare is extending his contract before the deal goes down then thats not your "rent-a-player". We would get a consistent lineup and no what-if thoughts throughout the long season when the Nelly is juggling his go-to guys. Amare is a superstar compared to Beans. Beans was great with baron only. He'll get his numbers but he doesnt have that killer instincts that Amare has in the post. Most importantly, this trade will bring much excitement because Amare brings everything the Warriors been wishing, which is a big man that can score unwillingly. Amare has already proved he gun be successful in the run and gun offense. Everyone has seen what garnett has done with boston. This is not a bad trade at all. Marco will not reach his peak with this team because there is simply too many guards.
What's funny? He may be better, but it's not by any significant margin...Originally Posted by dland24
