- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
sorry but i honestly cant tell if you're close minded and stubborn or just fishing for a pointless argument
data is data, statistics showing that self driving cars in 2015 are less likely to get into an accident than human driven cars in 2015 is not only valid but far more important in predicting future trends than the 50-60 year old data you're talking about. The sample size of self driving cars is only getting larger and the rate of machine error doesnt seem to be going up.
skimmed through the thread, didnt find it. could you copy and paste it or come up with another example? or am I wasting my time with your pointless arguments
data is data, statistics showing that self driving cars in 2015 are less likely to get into an accident than human driven cars in 2015 is not only valid but far more important in predicting future trends than the 50-60 year old data you're talking about. The sample size of self driving cars is only getting larger and the rate of machine error doesnt seem to be going up.
skimmed through the thread, didnt find it. could you copy and paste it or come up with another example? or am I wasting my time with your pointless arguments