- 7,361
- 4,416
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
Shape reminds me of the Dada's Webber wore
View media item 2469453
View media item 2469453
Big Baller Brand Thread- Lonzo Ball's first sneaker the ZO2! UNDEFEATED NEVA LOSST!!
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by clarkkent415,
- Start date
- 73,250
- 60,050
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
new "colorway" or pretty much the same colorway just different materials, maybe the mesh version will be more "affordable"
View media item 2472969
View media item 2472969
- 11,972
- 7,934
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
God that fake boost just makes the shoes look so cheap
- 88,262
- 47,255
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
hey you leave the balloost cushioning system alone
Last edited:
- 21,281
- 20,784
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- 11,972
- 7,934
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 133,456
- 111,605
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
- 73,250
- 60,050
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 88,262
- 47,255
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
damn they look so cheap and the purple laces aint helping
how long til u think ball stops wearing them?
cant imagine the tech being anything special
how long til u think ball stops wearing them?
cant imagine the tech being anything special
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
Those shoes might not be safe to ball in...
- 6,830
- 5,112
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
would look better with a black or grey upper.... also those NBA draft hats are terrible....
- 4,437
- 3,030
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
Its sad how the ZO2 has more true laker cws than the kobe ad's. Would never buy the zo2 but I like the color scheme at least lol
- 1,519
- 256
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2008
The shoe looks horrible, unbreathable and doesn't look like it gives a good lock down fit. The way it's shaped, it seems like your heel can slip in and out unless tied real tight. $495 for a shoe that basically ripped off the Boost and Kobe that took only THREE hours to design. That's insane that someone would pay more than Starbury money for these.
- 2,438
- 1,488
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2015
def a cop for 100, not a penny more.
- 11,972
- 7,934
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
I wouldn't pay $5
- 88,262
- 47,255
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
40 dollars seems reasonable when you count inflation
starburys were 15 bucks i believe and these look inline with those
starburys were 15 bucks i believe and these look inline with those
Proposition Joe
formerly rollinwithangel
- 10,215
- 8,048
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
No different than people paying over $1k for yeezys
- 88,262
- 47,255
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
who pays 1k for yeezys besides hybeasts and **** bootys?
- 2,457
- 2,523
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
Obviously more ppl than you realize since yeezys get sold for 3x or more their retail value on a regular basis.
Last edited:
- 21,281
- 20,784
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- 88,262
- 47,255
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
i wouldnt be caught dead in yeezys
but carry on
but carry on
- 2,457
- 2,523
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
And there is a good chance I wouldnt be caught dead is half of your collection ( if you have a shoe stable) .....wanna talk about other things we dont have in common with others since you dont seem to fully grasp the concept of different ppl like different things? Lol
- 33,349
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
If any of you don't think this looks like a shoe from Walmart/K-Mart you are ******* blind.
- 2,438
- 1,488
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2015
i guess i'm just curious enough to find out how it feels and performs for 100 bux. i actually don't care about the looks as much as the way it performs. you might speculate but until you actually hoop in them, you'll never know for sure, and i would like to know for sure, but just not at 500 bux.
midnitegreen
formerly austin066
- 509
- 226
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
the fact that they've only worn them once or twice when they were relaxing but then have switch to Hardens every time they get on the court should tell you everything you need to know.
its also terrible marketing.
