- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
Had this discussion with coworkers...
The kid is obviously set for life but I find it's selfish to have a kid at 65 years old (66 when the kid is born) knowing the kid must likely will have a dad for a limited amount of time in their life. I know that can be the case for a lot of kids but this is a bit more controllable.
Thoughts?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...ly-joel-girlfriend-expecting-a-baby/25807067/
The kid is obviously set for life but I find it's selfish to have a kid at 65 years old (66 when the kid is born) knowing the kid must likely will have a dad for a limited amount of time in their life. I know that can be the case for a lot of kids but this is a bit more controllable.
Thoughts?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...ly-joel-girlfriend-expecting-a-baby/25807067/
Last edited: