Originally Posted by
Rolaholic
Originally Posted by
finnns2003
Originally Posted by beansietime
The C's have trouble with free agents historically for a few reasons:
1. they never really have had the cap space to make a huge signing.
2. Boston doesn't have the notoriety of NY or Chicago or the glitz and glamour of LA and Miami when pitching the City to a young millionaire. In NY or Chicago the player can make a lot more money because of the market there, In LA and Miami they can get a lot more fame because of the ridiculousness there. If I was young and had millions I'd probably want to live in one of those places too.
3. Boston is an expensive place to live and earn money. When compared to cities in Florida and Texas, the player can bank a lot more cash than they can in Boston because of taxes and cost of living. I think Boston probably compares favorably in this sense to NY and LA though.
Right but people said the same thing about the Sox and Patriots before they started becoming top teams too. I think the C's are back for good in terms of being a "top" NBA franchise to play for. Ownership MUST hold their end of the bargain and continue to demand a winner, and not go back to the 90's
You're really comparing the Sox and Pats who are in the top 3 most valuable franchises in their sports to the C's? I agree that the front office should be more aggressive in getting top free agents but it's a tough sell. There's not much to go on other than history. Like posted before,other cities like LA,Miami,NY,Chicago have more to offer.