/ Register

||| FREE RUN+ 3 & iD ||| EXT Collection (pg43) |||

Discussion in 'Nike' started by illustrayt, Sep 6, 2011.

Page 2 of 57
  1. Sep 15, 2011 #26
    kidcloudkicker
    #26 Sep 15, 2011

    kidcloudkicker

    926
    82
    Joined
    Nov 1, 2008
    2s>1s>3s for me. NOt feeling the new design at all. 2s are definitely fire!
     
  2. Sep 17, 2011 #27
    illustrayt
    #27 Sep 17, 2011

    illustrayt

    11,487
    3,118
    Joined
    Apr 18, 2005
    UPDATE (09/16/11) Courtesy of CounterKicks:
    - Weighs in at 8.7 oz (Size 10)
    - $100 MSRP
    - All have Reflective Silver Swooshes
    - "          " Pure Platinum Midsoles (?) [​IMG]

      
     
  3. Sep 17, 2011 #28
    mastergrim8
    #28 Sep 17, 2011

    mastergrim8

    827
    66
    Joined
    Jan 8, 2011
    ^in other words, Nike adds a few flashy touches but increases the shoe by $10.
    All a gimmick in my opinion for an unfair rise in price
     
  4. Sep 17, 2011 #29
    brilliant
    #29 Sep 17, 2011

    brilliant Administrator

    858
    54
    Joined
    Feb 16, 2000
  5. Sep 17, 2011 #30
    freelythinkingmind
    #30 Sep 17, 2011

    freelythinkingmind

    924
    43
    Joined
    Sep 2, 2011
    I like them i mean , they are ok, the neon bars seem ok... i guess ill grab a couple pairs.
     
  6. Sep 18, 2011 #31
    bdeazy
    #31 Sep 18, 2011

    bdeazy

    1,815
    35
    Joined
    Nov 24, 2003
    None will be copped, not even at half-off. I'll invest in another tripod
     
  7. Sep 25, 2011 #32
    trajanbgky
    #32 Sep 25, 2011

    trajanbgky

    30
    10
    Joined
    Oct 8, 2010
  8. Sep 25, 2011 #33
    dr damon
    #33 Sep 25, 2011

    dr damon

    1,665
    337
    Joined
    May 1, 2001
    ^ now those are more like it. maybe the ones we have been looking at are the "walking version"
     
  9. Sep 25, 2011 #34
    trajanbgky
    #34 Sep 25, 2011

    trajanbgky

    30
    10
    Joined
    Oct 8, 2010
    Very well could be the walking version. Whatever they are, I would only cop the black/grey pair. I don't want volt on a blue pair of shoes.
     
  10. Sep 25, 2011 #35
    illustrayt
    #35 Sep 25, 2011

    illustrayt

    11,487
    3,118
    Joined
    Apr 18, 2005
    There is NO DOUBT I'd prefer these over the FR3s in the original post. However, the info provided by zzazin is always ON POINT. I'm pretty sure those are fakes.
      
     
  11. Sep 25, 2011 #36
    trajanbgky
    #36 Sep 25, 2011

    trajanbgky

    30
    10
    Joined
    Oct 8, 2010
    A search for "Nike Free Run 3" in Google Images brings up a ton of colorways for the ones I posted. Could be fake, I just find the sole on the original pair posted a little sketchy for the Free Run+ 3. I thought the 5.0 sole was separate from the Free Run line. 3.0 Line, 5.0 Line, 7.0 Line, and Free Run Line, all separate models, correct?
     
  12. Sep 25, 2011 #37
    illustrayt
    #37 Sep 25, 2011

    illustrayt

    11,487
    3,118
    Joined
    Apr 18, 2005
    That's right. I believe the FR sole is considered a 4.0. That's Nike for you... [​IMG]

    CounterKicks has even provided the official tech spec of the FR3... 


     
     
  13. Sep 25, 2011 #38
    trajanbgky
    #38 Sep 25, 2011

    trajanbgky

    30
    10
    Joined
    Oct 8, 2010
    Guess I'm just in denial that they would take such a great line in this direction. Very disappointed. Looks like I'll stock up on FR2s and maybe cop the black FR3.
     
  14. Sep 26, 2011 #39
    drew
    #39 Sep 26, 2011

    drew

    5,513
    757
    Joined
    May 15, 2008
    FR2s>>>>>>________



    -Drew
     
  15. Oct 3, 2011 #40
    illustrayt
    #40 Oct 3, 2011

    illustrayt

    11,487
    3,118
    Joined
    Apr 18, 2005
  16. Oct 3, 2011 #41
    rooster1188
    #41 Oct 3, 2011

    rooster1188

    376
    10
    Joined
    Jan 16, 2009
    The 2s are killing these I guess ill buy a couple more pairs of the 2s since I will be not getting the 3s
     
  17. Oct 3, 2011 #42
    c4
    #42 Oct 3, 2011

    c4

    3,040
    486
    Joined
    Jun 8, 2008
    I'm with most of you, 2s>1s>3s imo
     
  18. Oct 10, 2011 #43
    bdeazy
    #43 Oct 10, 2011

    bdeazy

    1,815
    35
    Joined
    Nov 24, 2003
    passity-pass-pass
     
  19. Oct 11, 2011 #44
    nermindee
    #44 Oct 11, 2011

    nermindee

    4,328
    653
    Joined
    May 9, 2005
    oh my goodness. PASS.... these look so boring
     
  20. Jan 7, 2012 #45
    illustrayt
    #45 Jan 7, 2012

    illustrayt

    11,487
    3,118
    Joined
    Apr 18, 2005
    Sample pics via eBay
    [​IMG]





















      
     
  21. Jan 7, 2012 #46
    peedot
    #46 Jan 7, 2012

    peedot

    42
    10
    Joined
    Jan 2, 2012
    These Don't Quite Match Up To The 2's But I'm Sure They'll Be Awesome To Run In.
     
  22. Jan 7, 2012 #47
    melofan15
    #47 Jan 7, 2012

    melofan15

    2,503
    82
    Joined
    Apr 29, 2004
     
  23. Jan 7, 2012 #48
    bravo
    #48 Jan 7, 2012

    bravo

    7,734
    2,087
    Joined
    Jun 27, 2005
    2s are definitely a lot better lookin than these


    if those mango samples drop, they will be copped quickly..
     
  24. Jan 7, 2012 #49
    sbsallday12
    #49 Jan 7, 2012

    sbsallday12

    337
    11
    Joined
    Jan 12, 2009
    2>1>3 wasn't Snoop Dogg in a group called 213?
     
  25. Jan 8, 2012 #50
    illustrayt
    #50 Jan 8, 2012

    illustrayt

    11,487
    3,118
    Joined
    Apr 18, 2005
    From the looks of it, these should've, honestly, been the Free Run 2.
     
Page 2 of 57