- 7,322
- 28,707
- Joined
- Dec 8, 1999
That was part of the point.i thought the "big three" purposely took a pay cut to play with each other, those numbers can be deceptive as to what the heat could have actually paid had they paid their full worth.
nevertheless, the rest of this post was great
It's usually considered a virtue in sports when an athlete places winning before financial compensation. Who on the Mavericks made that type of sacrifice? You can easily make the case that Miami has plenty of "team first" guys on their roster as well.
Although I wanted to see Dallas beat Miami in the Finals, I can't view Dallas as an "underdog" in this league. They go deep into the luxury tax every year in attempt to put the best team on the floor and, though that's great for Dallas fans, many others view it as an attempt to buy a championship. While onlookers have spent the better part of a year excoriating James and Wade for engineering free agent signings that are supposedly "anti-competitive," the same could be said about any team that seeks to use a larger market or an especially deep-pocketed ownership group to its advantage.
Why is it that an owner can attempt to game the system to their advantage, but players can't? People don't seem to like the idea that athletes can influence the balance of power in the league or even their own situations. Whenever a player attempts to force a trade or discourage a particular team from drafting them, fans boil over with rage, and it just seems to feed back into this notion that players are expected to "know their place" and should never aspire to exceed their station.