- 508
- 262
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
So confusing... So end up with Nedovic and Goodwin?
GO TO SEASON THREAD.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by luong1209,
- Start date
TheGodFresco
formerly gsdoubleu
- 24,478
- 2,308
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
Just nedovic
- 3,846
- 1,896
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
Is there really talks about sending Love over here for Barnes and Lee? All those sources via Google are from sites I'm not too familiar with.
- 2,312
- 214
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
^ man I would do that in a heartbeat!
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
I wouldn't. Maybe Lee for Love, but not Barnes. His team didn't get "good" until they got Rubio. I'm not saying he should lead his team to the playoffs alone, but they were horrible.
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
Ill pass. Barnes is the deal breaker. Lee for Love? In a heartbeat
- 3,846
- 1,896
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
Sorry forgot to mention Alexey Shved as part of the deal......still wouldn't do it.
TheGodFresco
formerly gsdoubleu
- 24,478
- 2,308
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
Link to this?
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
Lets sign Seth Curry
- 27,785
- 12,447
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2011
- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
White Mamba on our coaching staff? It's over.
For the rest of the NBA.
For the rest of the NBA.
- 3,846
- 1,896
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
It was from the Facebook page "The Basketball Fever" that was posted on my feed.
- 508
- 262
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
Klay for Iggy... make it happen
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nba/1158/david-lee
"The Warriors are reportedly exploring trade options for David Lee, but they were rebuffed in their offers for Andrea Bargnani and LaMarcus Aldridge.
Lee would have been packaged with Rush in the Aldridge deal, but it's not surprising that their offers were spurned -- Lee is owed $44 million over the next three years, and his defensive shortcomings tend to offset his offensive skills. Lee is currently recovering from hip surgery he had in late May, but he's expected to be ready for training camp."
Gross
"The Warriors are reportedly exploring trade options for David Lee, but they were rebuffed in their offers for Andrea Bargnani and LaMarcus Aldridge.
Lee would have been packaged with Rush in the Aldridge deal, but it's not surprising that their offers were spurned -- Lee is owed $44 million over the next three years, and his defensive shortcomings tend to offset his offensive skills. Lee is currently recovering from hip surgery he had in late May, but he's expected to be ready for training camp."
Gross
- 3,004
- 1,005
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2005
maaaaaan, imagine LA on our squad! I pray the front office can work something out to get him.
TheGodFresco
formerly gsdoubleu
- 24,478
- 2,308
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
What the **** we wanted to give lee for Bargnani?!???? Dude is trash
- 7,414
- 4,508
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
I aint too happy bout the Lee trade rumors but if we get Lamarcus or Love Im in.
- 30,453
- 5,506
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
Rumor in NY has it that y'all want Tyson Chandler. As for who, that remains a mystery to us in the Knicks thread.
- 27,986
- 9,077
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
I'll be estaic if we trade Lee's contract.
antidope
Supporter
- 62,775
- 66,111
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
Seriously? You would want this? Maybe theres something about Andre Igoudala that I dont know about but I would not make this trade. No way no how.
- 27,986
- 9,077
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
There's something that I am not quite understanding with the whole potential trade idea for Dwight Howard. The current rumor is Bogut & Barnes/Klay for Dwight. Now, I understand that isnt an offer that is on the table from us, but it seems to be a bigger package than it needs to be.
Not that Howard isnt worth those players.....he definitely is. BUT, the Lakers are about to get nothing for Howard. Why isn't the rumor Bogut and filler for Howard? Why does it include Barnes or Klay? The Lakers have no leverage here. Wouldn't they be better served to get SOMETHING for Howard instead of NOTHING?
It seems a lot of NBA fans have gone sour on Howard, and I cant understand it. He is the best center in the league, and the Warriors are essentially built the same way the Magic were....except being a much better version of that team. Dwight would flourish here, and we would be amazing with him.
I would love to have him on the team. I just would rather not have to give up good, young and inexpensive pieces to make it happen. Bogut and filler seems more than enough to give up to a team that will likely get nothing for him.
Not that Howard isnt worth those players.....he definitely is. BUT, the Lakers are about to get nothing for Howard. Why isn't the rumor Bogut and filler for Howard? Why does it include Barnes or Klay? The Lakers have no leverage here. Wouldn't they be better served to get SOMETHING for Howard instead of NOTHING?
It seems a lot of NBA fans have gone sour on Howard, and I cant understand it. He is the best center in the league, and the Warriors are essentially built the same way the Magic were....except being a much better version of that team. Dwight would flourish here, and we would be amazing with him.
I would love to have him on the team. I just would rather not have to give up good, young and inexpensive pieces to make it happen. Bogut and filler seems more than enough to give up to a team that will likely get nothing for him.
Last edited:
- 88,419
- 47,521
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
because the rockets or mavs could probably offer a better lowball offer 
I personally wouldn't want to give up too much for him because I don't want to take away from one strenght and put him higher up on the offense list than he needs to be.
That being said, I think you're overlooking what leverage the Lakers do have - they have multiple suitors wanting his services and thus can pick the best package because they can offer the most FA $. Regardless as to where he goes, my guess is going to be a s&t to some degree, no?
That being said, I think you're overlooking what leverage the Lakers do have - they have multiple suitors wanting his services and thus can pick the best package because they can offer the most FA $. Regardless as to where he goes, my guess is going to be a s&t to some degree, no?
Last edited:
- 87,858
- 116,401
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
In this case, since the Warriors have no cap space to get Dwight outright it is sort of in the Lakers' hands in regards to what they can get back. They can demand Bogut, Jefferson and one of Thompson or Barnes. I believe the magic number needed for the Warriors is $23 million worth of salary to the Lakers in a sign-and-trade involving Dwight.
Now if Dwight makes an ultimatum, "I'll sign with the Rockets and leave you with nothing or we can work a sign-and-trade with the Warriors for you to get something back without hurting long-term flexibility" then maybe that changes things.
Last edited:
