rell826
Banned
- Apr 25, 2013
- 6,740
- 2,125
He's alive. He smiled as his brain began to grow. Would have been the second villain had Norton's Hulk got a sequel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Something tells me the FF reboot is going to be much better than we all think.
I dont get the question. Wasnt what thanks to a resurected thanos?
Hahahaha... Yeah I agree I can't see fox putting a movie out that comes anywhere close to the worse marvel studios movie..And would still be bad
Mickey Rourke was such a waste. He would be perfect as a lot of villains too. smh
Yeah that's the one. Cancerverse where drax kills him. And my question was isn't that the Thanos (the pic you posted) that was in a alt reality and was resurrected?Thanos has died and ressurected a few times so probably. Not sure I am getting your question. Especially since I read the events out of order but I do know he died and was resurrected in an Adam Warlock cocoon. He also died in the cancerverse (is that what you mean by alt reality?), they should be explaining why he is dead soon. Unless I missed something it was 616 Thanos in the cancerverse.
Im2 was clouded with setting up the avengers I would have to agree. I think marvel has learned from their mistakes and have put out some quality movies as of late. Hope they stay on that trend.Which brings me back to my theory that the sequel cannot be about the hero. They made iron man 2 about tony AGAIN, and left out basically everyone else. Who's even the bad guy? Hammer or whiplash? They tried to build then both up and ended up doing nothing with both. Sprinkle in some gratuitous "avengers is coming out!!" Sub plots, and you get a mess of a film.
FF is destined for mediocrity
And would still be bad
Yeah that's the one. Cancerverse where drax kills him. And my question was isn't that the Thanos (the pic you posted) that was in a alt reality and was resurrected?
I kinda thought they did that in iron man 2 when stark was drunk and Rhodes took off with the ironman armor.IM3 was worse than IM2. IM3 was a perfect time to set up Demon In The Bottle. After witnessing an alien invasion, I'd prolly pick up the bottle myself.
Haven't read to much of that one. Just picked up some bits here and there.Yah he was resurrected but we dont know why yet. They are explaining it soon. Yes the Cancerverse is an alt reality but it was mainstream continuity Thanos that was killed. But I wouldnt be surprised to hear that it wasnt 616 Thanos or some other ******** explanation when they explain why he is still alive.
They watered it down, just like they did ExtremisI kinda thought they did that in iron man 2 when stark was drunk and Rhodes took off with the ironman armor.
Still doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a great filmFiege said that iron man 3 served more to phase 2 more than people will think. Ultron being the case there.
Haha I feel you but it did serve a purpose. Couple of tweeks here and there it could have been better. I was hoping to see more of aim and have Mallen be the main villain. In the cinematic universe they are constantly mixing the comic book villains. Killian was Mallen, scientist supreme all in one.Still doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a great film
That's BS. Pretty much all of these films are setting up for something bigger down the line. It's not an excuse to deliver something crappy.
It didn't have to be. It served its purpose. Transition
That's BS. Pretty much all of these films are setting up for something bigger down the line. It's not an excuse to deliver something crappy.