HBO Michael Jackson doc 'Leaving Neverland'

[Arthur Shelby]

They really doing this

 

[Humbled]

Won't watch. Mike ain't touch them kids man

 

[macbk]

I'm very interested to see what it covered.

 

[Arthur Shelby]

Official Trailer

 

[Maximus Meridius]

Mike's niece

 

[Maximus Meridius]

 

[gregzzy23]

HBO is sad for this. these 2 men have ZERO credibility

 

[rillo561]

Looking forward to this. Don't want to believe.

 

[adobecs4]

Not watching this

 

[bjw1983]

Not watching this either.

These guys tried to sue Michael's estate back around 2013-2014 and their cases were thrown out of court (falsified documents, etc) It was also around the time that Michael's estate finally paid off Michael's debts and the estate was finally in the black (that was always a red flag for me). Plus, if Mike really did all of these things, one guy could've put Michael in jail during the 2005 trail but he, as a grown man, defended Michael and continued to for years (even after Mike died). Too many things just aren't adding up. Along with the fact that we're dealing with accusations about a man who is no longer able to defend himself. The sad part about this is that in today's social media climate, people work off of accusations and not the truth/research. We'll see how this plays out.

 

[macbk]

 

[vood99]

These clowns coming out with all these 'documentaries' because they're trending upward in popularity. Facts be damned.

 

[hand2handking]

Michael Jackson Estate Sues HBO For $100 Million Over Leaving Neverland

https://411mania.com/music/michael-jackson-estate-sues-hbo-for-100-million-over-leaving-neverland/

TMZ reports that the Estate has sued claiming that HBO signed a contract including a non-disparagement agreement in 1992.

According to the suit, the agreement prevented HBO from “make[ing] any disparaging remarks concerning Performer or any of his representatives, agents, or business practices or do any act that may harm or disparage or cause to lower in esteem the reputation or public image of performer.”

HBO, who will premiere the docuseries next month, told TMZ, “Despite the desperate lengths taken to undermine the film, our plans remain unchanged. HBO will move forward with the airing of LEAVING NEVERLAND, the two-part documentary, on March 3rd and 4th.”

 

[Grine]

Oprah what are you doing?

 

[hand2handking]

 

[Maximus Meridius]

Oprah always been funny style. She play both sides. She know white women are her audience that's why she spent years blaming rappers for the worlds problems. That's what they wanna hear.

 

[Arthur Shelby]

 

[macbk]

 

[icysoles718]

Wow, Mikes a legend and sad to see people trying to tear his name down ultimately for a quick buck. Shame on HBO for this

 

[Leebro]

That Wade Robson is lyin' like MF'er.

An article from Forbes...

Leaving Neverland—wrote in tribute to his friend:

Michael Jackson changed the world and, more personally, my life forever. He is the reason I dance, the reason I make music, and one of the main reasons I believe in the pure goodness of humankind. He has been a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragement and his unconditional love will live inside of me forever. I will miss him immeasurably, but I know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk.


Robson was twenty-seven years old at the time. Four years earlier, he testified at Jackson’s 2005 trial (as an adult) that nothing sexual ever happened between them. Prior to the trial Robson hadn’t seen Jackson for years and was under no obligation to be a witness for the defense. He faced a withering cross-examination, understanding the penalty of perjury for lying under oath. But Robson adamantly, confidently, and credibly asserted that nothing sexual ever happened.

What changed between then and now? A few things:

• In 2011, Robson approached John Branca, co-executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, about directing the new Michael Jackson/Cirque du Soleil production, ONE. Robson admitted he wanted the job “badly,” but the Estate ultimately chose someone else for the position.
• In 2012, Robson had a nervous breakdown, triggered, he said, by an obsessive quest for success. His career, in his own words, began to “crumble.”
• That same year, with Robson’s career, finances, and marriage in peril, he began shopping a book that claimed he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson. No publisher picked it up.
• In 2013, Robson filed a $1.5 billion dollar civil lawsuit/creditor’s claim, along with James Safechuck, who also spent time with Jackson in the late ‘80s. Safechuck claimed he only realized he may have been abused when Robson filed his lawsuit. That lawsuit was dismissed by a probate court in 2017.
• In 2019, the Sundance Film Festival premiered a documentary based entirely on Robson and Safechuck's allegations. While the documentary is obviously emotionally disturbing given the content, it presents no new evidence or witnesses. The film's director, Dan Reed, acknowledged not wanting to interview other key figures because it might complicate or compromise the story he wanted to tell.

It is tempting for the media to tie Jackson into a larger cultural narrative about sexual misconduct. R. Kelly was rightfully taken down by a documentary, and many other high-profile figures have been exposed in recent years, so surely, the logic goes, Michael Jackson must be guilty as well. Yet that is a dangerous leap—particularly with America's history of unjustly targeting and convicting black men—that fair-minded people would be wise to consider more carefully before condemning the artist. It is no accident that one of Jackson’s favorite books (and movies) was To Kill a Mockingbird, a story about a black man—Tom Robinson—destroyed by false allegations.

The media’s largely uncritical, de-contextualized takes out of Sundance seem to have forgotten: no allegations have been more publicly scrutinized than those against Michael Jackson. They elicited a two-year feeding frenzy in the mid-90s and then again in the mid-2000s, when Jackson faced an exhaustive criminal trial. His homes were ransacked in two unannounced raids by law enforcement. Nothing incriminating was found. Jackson was acquitted of all charges in 2005 by a conservative Santa Maria jury. The FBI, likewise, conducted a thorough investigation. Its 300-page file on the pop star, released under the Freedom of Information Act, found no evidence of wrongdoing.

Meanwhile, dozens of individuals who spent time with Jackson as kids continue to assert nothing sexual ever happened. This includes hundreds of sick and terminally ill children such as Bela Farkas (for whom Jackson paid for a life-saving liver transplant) and Ryan White (whom Jackson befriended and supported in his final years battling AIDS); it includes lesser-known figures like Brett Barnes and Frank Cascio; it includes celebrities like Macaulay Culkin, Sean Lennon, Emmanuel Lewis, Alfonso Ribeiro, and Corey Feldman; it includes Jackson’s nieces and nephews; and it includes his own three children.

The allegations surrounding Jackson largely faded over the past decade for a reason: unlike the Bill Cosby or R. Kelly cases, the more people looked into the Jackson allegations, the more the evidence vindicated him. The prosecution’s case in 2005 was so absurd Rolling Stone‘s Matt Taibbi described it like this:

Ostensibly a story about bringing a child molester to justice, the Michael Jackson trial would instead be a kind of homecoming parade of insipid American types: grifters, suckers and no-talent schemers, mired in either outright unemployment… or the bogus non-careers of the information age, looking to cash in any way they can. The MC of the proceedings was District Attorney Tom Sneddon, whose metaphorical role in this American reality show was to represent the mean gray heart of the Nixonian Silent Majority – the bitter mediocrity itching to stick it to anyone who’d ever taken a vacation to Paris. The first month or so of the trial featured perhaps the most compromised collection of prosecution witnesses ever assembled in an American criminal case – almost to a man a group of convicted liars, paid gossip hawkers or worse…

In the next six weeks, virtually every piece of his case imploded in open court, and the chief drama of the trial quickly turned into a race to see if the DA could manage to put all of his witnesses on the stand without getting any of them removed from the courthouse in manacles.

What’s changed since then?

In Robson’s case, decades after the alleged incidents took place, he was barbecuing with Michael Jackson and his children. He was asking for tickets to the artist’s memorial. He was participating in tributes. “I still have my mobile phone with his number in it,” Robson wrote in 2009, “I just can’t bear the thought of deleting his messages.”

Then, suddenly, after twenty years, his story changed and with his new claims came a $1.5 billion dollar lawsuit.

FILE- In this Jan. 25, 2019, file photo Brenda Jenkyns, left, and Catherine Van Tighem who drove from Calgary, Canada stand with signs outside of the premiere of the "Leaving Neverland" Michael Jackson documentary film at the Egyptian Theatre on Main Street during the 2019 Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. Michael Jackson's family members said Monday, Jan. 28, that they are "furious" that two men who accuse him of sexually abusing them as boys have received renewed attention because of a new documentary about them. The family released a statement denouncing "Leaving Neverland," a documentary film featuring Jackson accusers Wade Robson and James Safechuck. (Photo by Danny Moloshok/Invision/AP, File)DANNY MOLOSHOK/INVISION/AP

As an eccentric, wealthy, African American man, Michael Jackson has always been a target for litigation. During the 1980s and 1990s, dozens of women falsely claimed he was the father of their children. He faced multiple lawsuits falsely claiming he plagiarized various songs. As recently as 2010, a woman named Billie Jean filed a frivolous $600 million paternity lawsuit against Jackson’s Estate.

As someone who has done an enormous amount of research on the artist, interviewed many people who were close to him, and been granted access to a lot of private information, my assessment is that the evidence simply does not point to Michael Jackson's guilt. In contrast to Robson and Safechuck’s revised accounts, there is a remarkable consistency to the way people who knew the artist speak of him—whether friends, family members, collaborators, fellow artists, recording engineers, attorneys, business associates, security guards, former spouses, his own children—people who knew him in every capacity imaginable. Michael, they say, was gentle, brilliant, sensitive, sometimes naive, sometimes childish, sometimes oblivious to perceptions. But none believe he was a child molester.

 

[Mark Antony]

They must have bombshell evidence to come out with this, ,otherwise HBO will come out looking stupid.

 

[brendasdeadbaby]

How white folks say... canceling my hbo subscription.

 

[Leebro]

I think their approach is going to be as graphic as possible probably supporting and corroborating terms and behaviour other accusers have made in the past to add credibility to their claims. They've had years worth of claims and material to look through.

I am not some kind Michael Jackson apologist as someone with kids I think the worst things possible should be done to child abusers. But looking at everyone who has made a claim in the past there is always something shady about the claims, the accusers or their parents. Wade Robson for sure is the worst as he has spent so much time trying to get close to the jacksons.

My biggest issue with Robson is lets say your claims about Jackson are true and you were molested from 7-14. You then as a grown man testified in court to support your alleged abuser, to make the claims of another "abuse victim" seem less than credible. What type of man does that? Aide your alleged abuser in getting off another abuse case, allowing them cause all the pain and suffering you received to another human being? *****!!!

 

[vood99]

Oprah always been funny style. She play both sides. She know white women are her audience that's why she spent years blaming rappers for the worlds problems. That's what they wanna hear.

Ironically it's the kids of these same white women that are the number one audience for the rappers' music. Oprah shifty as heck.

 

[Maximus Meridius]

They must have bombshell evidence to come out with this, ,otherwise HBO will come out looking stupid.

They woulda put him in prison if they had some evidence. HBO don't care how they look, long as they get some views off this they're happy.