JORDAN 1 Black-Red -- RETAIL Vs FAKE-GM PAIRS ULTIMATE COMPARISON ON THE 1ST PAGE!!!!RECEIPTS ARE NO

v8erman said:
Either these will be the most available 1 this year or the least except black/golds. I feel like the former is true. I wouldnt doubt they make double these than royals. Will still sell out in a heartbeat. Dont think value will eclipse royals. There were reasons royals hit its current value that probably wont affect breds. Lol crossing fingers.
Click to expand...
Pretty much exactly wat I think. But what do we know? Lol
 
stayblunted said:
these will definitely be better then the banneds imo I dont like that big x on the back but I dont expect the leather to be nearly as good unfortunately
Click to expand...
497cbe6f_2ec520676c53b91a11177e6f49cf3cd3.gif

you obviously don't know what your talking about. How can these be better than banned 1s with lower quality leather?
 
Last edited:
itzzzberny said:
497cbe6f_2ec520676c53b91a11177e6f49cf3cd3.gif

you obviously don't know what your talking about.
Click to expand...
I agree with him its more true to og form is what I think he was talking about. I believe the shadows the shadows were better than the 09 pair and thats basically the banned release of the shadows. It's just how you like the shoe og form/ or quality. Not to say the 13 shadows werent good quality wise def best or second best out of this years retros
 
Welp time to sell these 2001s especially with the ridiculous amounts people are paying for them.
 
You guys think somebody would trade a pair of Royals from this year for these? lol I'm trying to grab 3 pairs (if possible) 1 to trade for Royal so I can have another pair of Royal, 1 to stock, and 1 to rock. 
 
I can see ppl trading royals for breds..sure. they are equals. Me personally I would keep royals. I just like the cw more. Both grail status tho IMO.
 
itzzzberny said:
If the quality is obviously not as good, how can they be better? That makes no sense.
Click to expand...
because the quality is only a notch off and your comparing 2 different types of leather... plus this is true to form so that makes it better in my OPINION 

I rather have a true to form with 9/10 quality and smaller price tag than a super limited  pricey special edition of the og shoe with 10/10 quality 
 
itzzzberny said:
If the quality is obviously not as good, how can they be better? That makes no sense.
Click to expand...

steelogreen hit it on the nail for me. it's just personal preference. I feel like the extra detailing on the banneds take away from the original and shouldn't even be compared..
 
SOFA KING AWSM said:
I can see ppl trading royals for breds..sure. they are equals. Me personally I would keep royals. I just like the cw more. Both grail status tho IMO.
Click to expand...
Exactly but to be cautious. So many gm royals are starting to float around and people could easily get had for a legit pair of breds for some crap.
 
Lol i dont know what to do with my dmp pair. I dont want anymore jumpman save for tge vegas 1s.
 
Really? why keep going back and forth about this pictures just surfaced why fight about a completely different shoe. itzzzberny why would he need a pair of banneds if hes saying he likes the 2013 because it doesnt have all that extra detail and truer to og form. No assumptions are being made because its FACT banneds have the x the what if different leather etc

Can we please get back to the 2013 pair. Thank You 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom