- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
Please make a size 10 a kids shoe for all models cept the IVs and maybe IIIs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if this guy says it then there a good deal of creditability behind what he says
200 RETAIL
THE NEW GS SIZING STARTS WITH THE REMASTERING JOINTS TOO
GS = SIZE 3.5-9 STARTING IN JAN 2015
9.5 AND UP = NEW MEN SIZES
JB , and some nike sig stuff
200 RETAIL
THE NEW GS SIZING STARTS WITH THE REMASTERING JOINTS TOO
GS = SIZE 3.5-9 STARTING IN JAN 2015
9.5 AND UP = NEW MEN SIZES
JB , and some nike sig stuff
When jb starts to remaster all of the og colorways of the iv's I'll pay attention.
9.5 is my Jordan VI size (these shoes are wide as ****. Hopefully I can fit into a 9 and get decent shaped VIs.
Im gonna do the hypebeast thing where my shoe size is between 7.5 and 12 as long as it's heat.
where did you got this info from ??
im a sz 8, so that means that next year i need to buy shoes in the GS section ?? lol
I still doubt it. No way. Size 9 a kids shoe?....no wayThis info is true....My boy confirmed it months ago.
I still doubt it. No way. Size 9 a kids shoe?....no way
very odd info, tho I do remember somebody saying the remastered retros were gonna run small, so maybe everybody will just be sizing up
Looks to be the pebbled stuff Jordan's using on their remastered products...
View media item 1168007
View media item 1168008
View media item 1168009
View media item 1168011
View media item 1168012
View media item 1168013
View media item 1168014
very odd info, tho I do remember somebody saying the remastered retros were gonna run small, so maybe everybody will just be sizing up
"Naw, it'll fit, I might just have to take the insole out."
OK, so this gonna be a long post with some big quotes, apologies in advance
The main difference in the shape of the OG shoes, and how the post-1999 molds ruin the look is reflected in the boxy, curled up toe box
There has also been significant pinching around the mid-foot and heel that is causing the overall shape to go Banana up
In the above picture of the OG, Ive marked how the toe-box is rolled down so it maintains a nice forward angle. In addition, you can see that the side leather forms the correct parallel "wave pattern" with the outsole. Most modern IV's pinch in here. Finally, the heel bump in the back is pronounced because the overall height of the ankle is higher, demonstrated by the larger space between the midsole and the Wing-Tab
In this picture we can see the difference that all the pinching has caused in the middle of the shoe. Even if the the toe box was properly rolled down, the inching would probably create a banana-toe effect anyway. But of course, the toe-box is also enormous and bulges up instead of following the angle of the shoe downward
Overall, I know that some of these differences are insignificant to many people, and in the normal retro threads I try to keep the ranting to a minimum. But I would think that if JB is gonna bother to remaster at all, then they should do it right.
The IV is meant to have a sloped, almost triangular look to it that gives it a sleek, forward looking esthetic like this OG below
I'll also include this nice comparison pic that shows how important the "wave pattern" leather is to maintaining the proper shape. The 99's kind of have boxy toes, and yet, because the mid-foot leather is wide and parallel, there is enough space below the wing tab and the esthetic of the shoe is maintained
Below is my original post on the 2012 BC IV
You can see how little space there was between the wing-tab and the midsole
AMAZING post! Very informative! Changing the shape of this shoe is one of my biggest problems with JB. The III have been butchered just as bad as far as shape goes. Got another visual comparison post for the III in you? THAT would blow peoples minds. It might even be worse than the IV lol
Most likely because they will finally put in actual padding.