- Oct 13, 2001
- 175,922
- 164,329
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You might, and I say miiiiiight, find where I say that I find Halle Berry attractive, or even let's say... Joy Taylor...but that damned woman who plays Bilquist on American Gods? WHHHHHHEEEEEEEWWWWWW!SOmebody find the post whereKHUFU called Denise Richards a 10. ( Prime DR was vicious though )
Really?
If you do not understand why posting a little white baby being afraid of darkened skin as being problematic, I do not know what to tell you.![]()
Expound, but if you’re gonna try to convince me to hate little white kids and pinch em unprovoked while no looking then it's gonna a waste of time. You should watch Dinosaur.
Boogerwolfs? Technically raising kids? Wearing masks to scare babies? Slender Mark Henry? White babies?If Allergic reaction Will Smith sat across the table from me I wouldn't eat b/c I'd just throw it up.
I also sister have who I'm technically raising now that I think about it (or at the very least helping raise). My sister that I personally had to tell and teach that it was wrong to stare at, cry, scream, and or point at when she saw a boogerwolf and say "look" when she learned that word.
I even have an "ugly" mask that I had use to scare tactics on her w/ that "ew/look/ugly" **** got so out of hand:
![]()
There's was this one time I was flabbergasted in the Target in City Point though. That woman just looked horrible. I'm cringing type this tbh. That lady had hair her on her ****ing chest too. One the few times I've saw seen someone in person and associated them w/ being "ugly". She was definitely a non transwoman too. Must've been 5'9 w/ a slender Mark Henry build, matching denim jacket & pants w/ a floral shirt that exposed cleavage, and all white sneakers. I don't I've been in that Target since. Just a horrible moment in my life
What does the baby being white have to do w/ anything? It's just a baby.

One name. Emmitt Till.All this, "White Women do nothing for me" talk byKHUFU
I wish there was a way I could lock you up in a room with one to see how that would play out.
Or it's b/c it see's some weird lumpy stuff on the mothers face.If you do not understand why posting a little white baby being afraid of darkened skin as being problematic, I do not know what to tell you.
Should've got it sooner. She was toddler by that then.Boogerwolfs? 2. Technically raising kids? Wearing masks to scare babies? Slender Mark Henry? White babies?
Man, what the hell did I just read![]()
Pastiest white woman would probably have him by the balls, literally.All this, "White Women do nothing for me" talk byKHUFU
I wish there was a way I could lock you up in a room with one to see how that would play out.
All the inspiration that I need.Pastiest white woman would probably have him by the balls, literally.
I wouldn't say that was the origin of people rating one another. In fact, I would say you're conflating two separate items where the only similarity is people placing a number on one another. People rate one another to see if they are fit to play certain roles. Whether it be because of physical attributes( To be a pilot, your physical height plays a role) To be a peltast in certain ancient armies, you had to be a certain build etc. While a rating system was used on black people during the times of slavery, it doesn't equate to "ranking someone's beauty". Beauty is also subjective. The context in which KS is rating some of these women is no different than if a modeling agency recruiter rates someone for their marketability for a specific campaign. This is different from a slave master rating people like they are cattle. While I agree that it is not the most effective way to determine if someone is fit and it boxes people in, I wouldn't say that ranking people is always considered "bad".Yes I have heard it, and that is why I am stating that it is indeed wrong. Again, the normalization of such standards and discussion, leads to discriminatory practices, those of unscrupulous origins. This is why they called Bo Derek a 10.
He never called Bo Derek a 10Man called Beyoncé a 7, Kelly Rowland a 9 but then has the audacity to call Bo Derek a 10.
But when I say the man is a c**n I’m wrong?

HE ASKED A WOMAN HOW MUCH SHE WEIGHS!!!!!!!I wouldn't say that was the origin of people rating one another. In fact, I would say you're conflating two separate items where the only similarity is people placing a number on one another. People rate one another to see if they are fit to play certain roles. Whether it be because of physical attributes( To be a pilot, your physical height plays a role) To be a peltast in certain ancient armies, you had to be a certain build etc. While a rating system was used on black people during the times of slavery, it doesn't equate to "ranking someone's beauty". Beauty is also subjective. The context in which KS is rating some of these women is no different than if a modeling agency recruiter rates someone for their marketability for a specific campaign. This is different from a slave master rating people like they are cattle. While I agree that it is not the most effective way to determine if someone is fit and it boxes people in, I wouldn't say that ranking people is always considered "bad".
He never called Bo Derek a 10![]()

HE ASKED A WOMAN HOW MUCH SHE WEIGHS!!!!!!!
As mentioned in my previous post there are weight restrictions/physical requirements for various functions and professions in society. There are weight restrictions for sky diving. You may love hefty women, but I don't. That doesn't mean I'm "fat phobic" or propagating negative stereotypes.HE ASKED A WOMAN HOW MUCH SHE WEIGHS!!!!!!!
We are not talking function here, we are discussing imagery. Samuels asked the question of how she looks, how much she weighs, in order to strike down the supposed qualifications she was requesting. It was fat phobic, it was indeed sexist and misogynist. The perception is indeed that if she had looked a certain way, that she would not be qualified to date or marry as she wanted.As mentioned in my previous post there are weight restrictions/physical requirements for various functions and professions in society. There are weight restrictions for sky diving. You may love hefty women, but I don't. That doesn't mean I'm "fat phobic" or propagating negative stereotypes.
If she were an athlete, I'd think that she'd have a response that would shut Samuels' mouth for good.What if she was an athlete?
I've said this on this site before. I wish that women were welcomed here by the male members.Weight is an important metric in partner selection on both sides. I don’t like big women. Automatic deal breaker![]()
If that was a woman’s strict preference, nothing for anybody to be upset about . I can’t speak for most men here though and how they would feel about it. As long as you aren’t “shaming” anyone, there shouldn’t be a problem.I've said this on this site before. I wish that women were welcomed here by the male members.
I wish that they could have a thread called Nine inches and above only.
That would be fantastic. I'd love to see how uncomfortable many of these members would be on here.
If women could speak their mind sexually, without feeling as if they would be called a ****, or other derogatory names? A woman's honesty would put a whole lotta men in their graves.If that was a woman’s strict preference, nothing for anybody to be upset about . I can’t speak for most men here though and how they would feel about it. As long as you aren’t “shaming” anyone, there shouldn’t be a problem.
Eye wouldn’t care personally because I don’t get offended easily. But that is in fact true. Men are just as insecure and fragile as we claim women can be but in different ways, and when it comes to sex, they definitely have ammo to hurt our feelings.If women could speak their mind sexually, without feeling as if they would be called a ****, or other derogatory names? A woman's honesty would put a whole lotta men in their graves.