LC: OG RED/WHITE XII's

[jaycruz.]

Also, would DS Chicago X's be a good trade for these?
And, I know the box doesnt match the shoes.

 

[robpzee612]

legit

 

[jaycruz.]

If these came out in 97 why does the tag say 96

 

[firepower23]

They are legit -they were made in '96 ...then released in '97

 

[serra2008]

sold my for 180 last year

 

[jvaldez]

Trade for recent released chicago 10s? I would keep Ogs

 

[hoardinjordanz]

These look like retroes.. Didn't og have nike on the insole? Also these are 9.5 box is 11

 

[firepower23]

Originally Posted by hoardinjordANZ

These look like retroes.. Didn't og have nike on the insole? Also these are 9.5 box is 11

The OGs had the Jumpman logo on the insoles too.
The XIIs were the first model to have no Nike logos anywhere on the shoe (Not counting the Aqua & White/red VIIIs)