LFA Vs GT-R

Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
2,590
Reaction score
36
Lexus LFA



* high-revving 552bhp 4.8-litre naturally aspirated V10 engine
* 6-speed Automated Sequential Gearbox
* Front Engine RWD
* Mainly Carbon constructed Body
* Carbon Ceramic Brakes, 20" wheels
* drag coefficient of 0.31
* WEIGHTS (kg)
Kerb weight: 1,480 - 1,580 kg
Gross vehicle weight: 1,700/1,750 kg
* 0-60 in 3.7sec and on way to 201mph
*Starting price: $350,000

GT-R Spec-V


* 3.8-litre 480bhp twin turbo V6
* GR6 dual-clutch transmission
* Front mid AWD
* Mixture of Traditional and carbon constructed body
* Carbon Ceramic Brakes, 20" wheels
* drag coefficient of 0.27
* kerb Weight 1,670Kg
* 0-60 in 3.5sec and on way to 195mph
*Starting price: $161,800


GTR got my vote
 
looks at pricetag

GT-R > Lexus

If im gonna spend anything near 350k on a car, you best believe it will be a lambo or a ferrari.
 
The GT-R is one of my dream cars, but Got DAMN, I love the LF-A.
 
i'm a proud Lexus owner & i love what they're doing with the "F" line.. but im going with the GT-R. no contest
 
Originally Posted by ksteezy

looks at pricetag

GT-R > Lexus

If im gonna spend anything near 350k on a car, you best believe it will be a lambo or a ferrari.
basically
glasses.gif
 
im pretty sure mercedes is getting the cover of gt5

lfa is sexy

gtr is beastly

but for 350k... lambo
 
also that's for the specV version, I think the base GTR can be had around $90 and it has the same power
 
How is it 4.8L V10 that just stupid,

GT-R>LFA

No competition
 
The sound of a 4.8L n/a V10 engine revving to 9000rpm is what does it for me.
 
Originally Posted by chris boshs neck

Both Hideous.... You spend that much on a whip you need something sexy


lamborghini-murcielago_lp640_versace_2007_1280x960_wallpaper_01.jpg


Ferrari_458_Italia.jpg

OVERRATED CRAP! The GT-R for sure.
 
Back
Top Bottom