New MBPs: "Ho hum upgrade" "Shoddy build quality"

[omgitswes]

Originally Posted by PatentBoy23

copping regardless.  I don't like Windows anymore.  HD Webcam and the females on Facetime

and Lion OS X is 

point proven.

 

[patentboy23]

Apple Care will be copped as well 

but for real.  Might just wait a little longer to cop since I'm broke and can wait till the shoddy ones aren't around. 

 

[patentboy23]

Apple Care will be copped as well 

but for real.  Might just wait a little longer to cop since I'm broke and can wait till the shoddy ones aren't around. 

 

[jordanhendrix]

so some extra thermal paste around the chip = poor build?

nice try.

Apple is overpriced no doubt but this argument is WEAK.....you can do better

 

[jordanhendrix]

so some extra thermal paste around the chip = poor build?

nice try.

Apple is overpriced no doubt but this argument is WEAK.....you can do better

 

[jfdoom]

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

so some extra thermal paste around the chip = poor build?

nice try.

Apple is over prices no doubt but this argument is WEAK

Don't you know that excess thermal paste DEFEATS the purpose of it?

 

[jfdoom]

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

so some extra thermal paste around the chip = poor build?

nice try.

Apple is over prices no doubt but this argument is WEAK

Don't you know that excess thermal paste DEFEATS the purpose of it?

 

[jordanhendrix]

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

 

[jordanhendrix]

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

 

[ac4three]

I have a MBP and it gets extremely hot if you're using it on a blanket or something. However, I rarely do this so it isn't really an issue for me.

 

[ac4three]

I have a MBP and it gets extremely hot if you're using it on a blanket or something. However, I rarely do this so it isn't really an issue for me.

 

[jfdoom]

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

I skipped over that, but he's wrong. Excess paste defeats the purpose of using it

 

[jfdoom]

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

I skipped over that, but he's wrong. Excess paste defeats the purpose of using it

 

[jordanhendrix]

jesus, again read the article YOU POSTED.

the purpose is to conduct heat, it doesn't HELP to have more. Having more doesn't defeat the purpose....which is to conduct heat away from the chip. There needs to be a certain amount, more was put there, PURPOSE NOT DEFEATED

 

[jordanhendrix]

jesus, again read the article YOU POSTED.

the purpose is to conduct heat, it doesn't HELP to have more. Having more doesn't defeat the purpose....which is to conduct heat away from the chip. There needs to be a certain amount, more was put there, PURPOSE NOT DEFEATED

 

[bruce negro]

Originally Posted by JFDOOM

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

I skipped over that, but he's wrong. Excess paste defeats the purpose of using it

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.

Macs do have problems with their builds, but there are MANY PCs with similar, worse problems. As a person who has had multiple PCs and Macs, I would know the comparisons. It's also difficult to say that PCs are built better than Macs, because you have to be careful about WHICH PC. There are some PC laptops which won't break in a hundred years and other PCs which will break down after 2. I think it's more valid to argue about the quality of the operating system rather than the build of the computers, because it depends which company is building the PC.

 

[bruce negro]

Originally Posted by JFDOOM

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

I skipped over that, but he's wrong. Excess paste defeats the purpose of using it

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.

Macs do have problems with their builds, but there are MANY PCs with similar, worse problems. As a person who has had multiple PCs and Macs, I would know the comparisons. It's also difficult to say that PCs are built better than Macs, because you have to be careful about WHICH PC. There are some PC laptops which won't break in a hundred years and other PCs which will break down after 2. I think it's more valid to argue about the quality of the operating system rather than the build of the computers, because it depends which company is building the PC.

 

[jordanhendrix]

dude needs to step up his game.....there are plenty of worthy macbook bashing review that he could use

 

[jordanhendrix]

dude needs to step up his game.....there are plenty of worthy macbook bashing review that he could use

 

[jfdoom]

Originally Posted by bruce negro

Originally Posted by JFDOOM

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

I skipped over that, but he's wrong. Excess paste defeats the purpose of using it

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.

Nah..i just skipped over that part

I did notice this, though

Holy thermal paste! Time will tell if the gobs of thermal paste applied to the CPU and GPU will cause overheating issues down the road.
Which proves what i've been saying.

 

[jfdoom]

Originally Posted by bruce negro

Originally Posted by JFDOOM

Originally Posted by jordanhendrix

^^^ NEgative, in the article you posted it says other wise. Quote from YOUR OWN link:


"But too much paste doesn't mean that the underlying processor will necessarily overheat and thus fail faster, cautioned Peddie."


Damn man, at least read what you're gonna post before hand....simpin it up lol

I skipped over that, but he's wrong. Excess paste defeats the purpose of using it

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.

Nah..i just skipped over that part

I did notice this, though

Holy thermal paste! Time will tell if the gobs of thermal paste applied to the CPU and GPU will cause overheating issues down the road.
Which proves what i've been saying.

 

[ag 47]

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.



Right.

dudes cherry picking info to support their hatred. I'll never understand for the life of me why yall care so much about what the next person buys.

 

[ag 47]

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.



Right.

dudes cherry picking info to support their hatred. I'll never understand for the life of me why yall care so much about what the next person buys.

 

[Fong$tarr]

Originally Posted by AG 47

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.

Right.

dudes cherry picking info to support their hatred. I'll never understand for the life of me why yall care so much about what the next person buys.


Exactly what I always think. This and the phone wars thing is so dumb.

And what PC laptop has a top build to it? I think all PCs are made just as bad.

 

[Fong$tarr]

Originally Posted by AG 47

You use an article on the basis that it has accurate info about the MBP, which you dislike. When it has information that doesn't go against the build of the MBP, you choose to ignore/refute it yourself? You should at least introduce new material which backs up your point, or else you just look like a biased fool.

Right.

dudes cherry picking info to support their hatred. I'll never understand for the life of me why yall care so much about what the next person buys.


Exactly what I always think. This and the phone wars thing is so dumb.

And what PC laptop has a top build to it? I think all PCs are made just as bad.