- 2,629
- 135
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2010
i just want the socks and gloves. what will you guys be carrying from this line?
We will not be carrying any of the collection.
EastbayRep - James
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i just want the socks and gloves. what will you guys be carrying from this line?
i just want the socks and gloves. what will you guys be carrying from this line?
We will not be carrying any of the collection.
EastbayRep - James
Any idea on the prices for the Megatron stuff ??
I NEED those gloves and socks in my life for football.
190 for the Flyposites, $140 for the Huarches, $70 for the hoody, $100 for the gloves, $28 for the tee, $25 for the socks, $28 for the hat. Nike is getting out of control with the glove prices, $100 for the NFL gloves and now $100 for these. Its seriously ridiculous, I mean really who the hell is gonna actually wear these in a game when they are so limited?
In the NFL, don't the Jordan logos have to be 'blacked out'?
Yeah, I thought so too....they didn't pay some license fee or something, is what I thought someone said....but noticed these during the game yesterday al well.In the NFL, don't the Jordan logos have to be 'blacked out'?
In the NFL, don't the Jordan logos have to be 'blacked out'?
NFL is Nike now so no
Yeah, I thought so too....they didn't pay some license fee or something, is what I thought someone said....but noticed these during the game yesterday al well.
This was in another thread....I don't think so. You still see cats wearing adidas cleats, ua cleats/gloves. Indiviudal athletes have their sponsorships. The NFL "being" Nike only refers to the team merchandise/uniforms. Cleats/ gloves/ and that stuff depends on the athlete.
Nike and UA are the only brands that are allowed to display their logos, adidas and Reebok are not licensed anymore. Thats why you see Jones-Drew, RG III, Eli and Peyton, etc wearing blacked out cleats and non-descript gloves. Its a bit odd to see. What gets me is how many dudes wear differing cleats and gloves, like Willis and Davis on the Niners wear UA cleats and are supposedly UA athletes but wear Nike gloves every game.
Nike has always been licensed for the cleats in the league, Jordan Brand however has still not procured a license, thus all the JB athletes cleats don't have the Jumpman and still why they wear Nike-branded gloves.
Nike paid a serious licensing fee in previous years to showcase their cleats.
Their entire placement of the Swoosh was imperative on designs based on their License and what they were paying for it.
If you remember towards the end of the season a few years back all of a sudden everyone all of a sudden started wearing Nike gloves with swooshes on them.
I want to say Jordan Brand only needs to pay into this fee with a few hundred thousand dollars....but its not really worth it to them for what they produce in cleats every year and send out in free product.
The showcasing of their cleats in the NFL doesnt give their inline stuff any push at all.
I assume this is the reason Adi and Reebok dont bother either... but then again Nike may have paid extra NOT to have anyone else other than UA be able to sport logos and UA is well liked by the league and its only opinion but I dont think Nike could have done anything to keep UA from getting a license.
Where at?
My question is, how much money does Nike have to pay Hasbro for the rights to use that logo and name?
I don't think so. You still see cats wearing adidas cleats, ua cleats/gloves. Indiviudal athletes have their sponsorships. The NFL "being" Nike only refers to the team merchandise/uniforms. Cleats/ gloves/ and that stuff depends on the athlete.
I know that but since Nike and JB go hand n hand they are allowed to have the logo
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Random thought.
Why does Phil Knight allow Nike to outfit Oregon State? Couldn't he easily tell them to F off and go to Adidas? Nike uni's obviously make OSU more competitive and help with recruiting. I heard OSU is getting a complete re-branding this summer just like ASU got before last season. Just wondering if anyone had some insight as to why Uncle Phil helps out the enemy.
Random thought.
Why does Phil Knight allow Nike to outfit Oregon State? Couldn't he easily tell them to F off and go to Adidas? Nike uni's obviously make OSU more competitive and help with recruiting. I heard OSU is getting a complete re-branding this summer just like ASU got before last season. Just wondering if anyone had some insight as to why Uncle Phil helps out the enemy.
Well today is cyber monday so there should be plenty of sales. Check out footballfanatics.com.