- 7,210
- 12,928
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2004
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yea like I said I didn't read anything on the shoe. They were just on sale and I assumed "ACG". I know better now.The toe box material is porous; you can see your socks thru them ;-). With the drainage system, the AOs really are about getting wet as opposed to keeping water out. Wish the mesh wasn't open like that though as even casual walking/hikes is likely to get dirt inside, which is annoying.
Yea like I said I didn't read anything on the shoe. They were just on sale and I assumed "ACG". I know better now.
what’s the fit like? if i wear a 34 waist, what size should i get?I have all colors of those, a bit baggy but it's tapered, length is perfect for a short guy like me.
To be honest, I actually don’t like these lows tho. Just sharing the info while hoping for some Mids in men’s to get retroed.I know some of you guys like those... but they remind me of middle school in the 1990s.
anyone cop the recent Nike ACG cargo pants? These ones:
I have these too. A nice baggy taper on me. I usually wear with Jordan 1s since the length is a little short. I’m 6’1 though.I have all colors of those, a bit baggy but it's tapered, length is perfect for a short guy like me.
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
EDIT: Forgot the jacket.
nice picks up
where did you get the gaiters... is that current season?
WTF does this kiddy keep putting up the pix someone other has already posted on the same thread? I mean, it’s understandable to do that if they were posted 20 pages back, but why does he need to do so if the same pics are already on the same or the previous page??
Nike Lahar Low “Wheat”
Style Code: DB9953-700
Release Date: January 2, 2020
Price: $130
Source: Sneakerbardetroit.
Soz didn't see. My bad. Apologies. Btw, you're here since 2003? Damn, impressive. You're kind of a cyber-gramps. Cheers.WTF does this kiddy keep putting up the pix someone other has already posted on the same thread? I mean, it’s understandable to do that if they were posted 20 pages back, but why does he need to do so if the same pics are already on the same or the previous page??
Ahhh..., 2003 was just the year when I finally decided to create my NT account in order to tell **** to the stupid kid on AM1 thread that kept asking “where I can find Air Max 1?” and never shut up. He simply was just too annoying to keep reading the thread and I’m sure I had started reading NT few years before that.Soz didn't see. My bad. Apologies. Btw, you're here since 2003? Damn, impressive. You're kind of a cyber-gramps. Cheers.
Duuuude knew about the 5th decade stuff BUT that 60 y/o is just something else. Mmmmh having a sneakerhead ancestor, such a good start in life.Ahhh..., 2003 was just the year when I finally decided to create my NT account in order to tell **** to the stupid kid on AM1 thread that kept asking “where I can find Air Max 1?” and never shut up. He simply was just too annoying to keep reading the thread and I’m sure I had started reading NT few years before that.
Feel Grampy? Yeah, sometimes, but knowing there are fellow NTers who are in their 50’s and have seen the one in 60’s recently, close to 50 isn’t that rare, I believe.
Ahhh..., 2003 was just the year when I finally decided to create my NT account in order to tell **** to the stupid kid on AM1 thread that kept asking “where I can find Air Max 1?” and never shut up. He simply was just too annoying to keep reading the thread and I’m sure I had started reading NT few years before that.
Feel Grampy? Yeah, sometimes, but knowing there are fellow NTers who are in their 50’s and have seen the one in 60’s recently, close to 50 isn’t that rare, I believe.