Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dang, $125. In 1992, that seems like a lot for these considering the Jordan 7 was $130 MSRP in 1992$125 in 1992. Adjusted for inflation, that’s $287 today![]()
How’s the fit/sizin?Look great on feet and veey comfy. This is the comfiest version of this shoe besides OGs. Loving them. Last pair i had was '11s...
![]()
![]()
Jordans were among the most expensive in the Nike line back then, but the Hauraches was right there with them. The Barkleys (Air Force 180 low) were also $125 I believe.

Could've sworn that the Air Force Max was $100 back then.Oh? I remember the Air Force Max was $135. I loved them but I was a Jordan guy and ended up with the Playoff 8’s, as moms wasn’t about to buy me both lol.
They were definitely 135. I remember having to choose between them and the 8’s. Went with the 8’s and though I don’t regret it, it was one of the tougher decisions I had to make when it came to shoes back then.Could've sworn that the Air Force Max was $100 back then.
Yeah, the Jordan 8’s retailed $140 in 93.They were definitely 135. I remember having to choose between them and the 8’s. Went with the 8’s and though I don’t regret it, it was one of the tougher decisions I had to make when it came to shoes back then.
The 2011’s looked good aesthetically, but poor quality compared to the 2015 and 2025. I remember Velcro on the strap was poorly placed and the “leather” on both sides were straight cardboard. The craftsmanship was also poor too. Lots of glue stains.the 2011’s were my coed rec flag football shoes in my last season w the league
ADVERTISEMENT
The three years we played, never won a single bout… but the comraderie was there and we had a blast (even played drunk most of the seasons)
Went thru prolly a dozen or so shoes during my ff tenure and And these were easily the best shoes for the turf (lightweight, sturdy, great for lateral and quick stops… couldnt beat em).
![]()
Doubled up on the 11’s but never got around to the second pair… had to retire due to self esteem being sabotaged for the endless defeated streak
![]()
Both size 11
2025’s are slightly larger… but good for me since i started wearing thicker hosiery and add insoles for my arthritic bear claws
![]()
![]()
Wasnt going to buy this years rendition because ive been cutting back substantially, but when i held a pair at Footlocker last week, man, was blown away by the build quality, materials and nostalgia. And yes. Also had the 1992’s as a handme down from a older homie back when, but man, remembered they were still great condition and even tho a full size too big, i donned them proudly. It was a feeling!
These are without a doubt; Retro of the años for me.
![]()
.
www.dtlr.com
Look great on feet and veey comfy. This is the comfiest version of this shoe besides OGs. Loving them. Last pair i had was '11s...
![]()
![]()
Could've sworn that the Air Force Max was $100 back then.
They were definitely 135. I remember having to choose between them and the 8’s. Went with the 8’s and though I don’t regret it, it was one of the tougher decisions I had to make when it came to shoes back then.
The first retro’s were $110Yeah, the first retros were $100, but the OG's were $130-$135 depending on the store.
The first retro’s were $110
