NIKE Air Jordan IV OG White Fire Red: Black Friday 2020: Nov. 28th

[dhtowng]

For everyone passing because of the shape, I respect y’all and appreciate the passion.
Im done worrying about the shape of shoes, I’m excited to finally own a pair.
they look pretty good in the new pics

Yeah life’s too short. Gotta pick your battles lol. The 11s and 3s seemed a worthy and noble cause but I personally can’t/won’t exhaust any time or energy into being upset about these. They look aesthetically fine to me. Much better than previous FR4 releases from what I can tell. Decided to copp my first pair of FR4s with these. Not my favorite cw but I of course need for the collection and a NA version is a must.

 

[nostalgia94]

Backtab comparison

 

[urbanmiracle]

**** it. I’m in. One pair.

 

[killaking]

Backtab comparison

looks center to me even though it doesnt matter

 

[1c3m4m]

**** it. I’m in. One pair.

me and u both

 

[engineer]

I’m gonna just put my magnifying glass down and enjoy these.

 

[bman71]

These aren't "made it taiwan" anymore, so were not getting "Made in taiwan / Indonesia quality.As far as the red goes, im not trippin over it. They'll be worn with primarily black clothing so the red will pop on the shoe, regardless of the shade. Im glad they brought back the "99" flimsy hangtag for these, i plan on using it on those sail ow 5..

 

[hutchie]

I swear white cement nike air wasnt that bent? Im in for fire reds

 

[nostalgia94]

I swear white cement nike air wasnt that bent? Im in for fire reds

Ya i think my pair looks better than the stock pics, either way the fire reds are improved from the BC

 

[JRepp23]

I swear white cement nike air wasnt that bent? Im in for fire reds

It wasnt. It was centered.

 

[BigSparky1316]

You know what's strange that I notice, a lot of the female IV's have a pretty good shape to them. I just seen a pair of those rasta 4s or w e they are called and they look pretty good.

 

[SteveSteve72]

I don’t even see any difference in those Backtab comparison pics.
I’ve still never seen anyone run up to someone with a ruler and say “ hey your Nike Air is off centered”

 

[JRepp23]

I dont know if thats a JB pic or not, but that is not what we got in 2016.

 

[2pacalypsenow]

looks center to me even though it doesnt matter

I think they meant the word ‘NIKE’ isn’t centered. You can see the ‘IK’ isn’t aligned with the ‘I’ in ‘AIR’.
The whole logo is centered but not the word Nike.

 

[nostalgia94]

I dont know if thats a JB pic or not, but that is not what we got in 2016.

It is, though I think that was an early preview. Here's another official Nike pic of the WC&BC.

 

[JRepp23]

It is, though I think that was an early preview. Here's another official Nike pic

View attachment 2648906

Funny how zero retail pairs ended up with speckle between the K and E. But the ones that did are deemed a fake.
The I should always go straight up the Ks ***. The only release that didnt was the BC4 .

 

[green rhino123]

I don’t even see any difference in those Backtab comparison pics.
I’ve still never seen anyone run up to someone with a ruler and say “ hey your Nike Air is off centered”

Speckle density

NIKe AIR

 

[BigSparky1316]

I dont know if thats a JB pic or not, but that is not what we got in 2016.

Omg man I was thinking the same thing. The white cements were steel toed low top dr. Martin looking shoes.

 

[xmigzx]

In, just hope everyone eats with ease.

 

[JRepp23]

Speckle density

NIKe AIR

Honestly I have liked them all. No stress here.

 

[el bro]

I don’t even see any difference in those Backtab comparison pics.
I’ve still never seen anyone run up to someone with a ruler and say “ hey your Nike Air is off centered”

I get it, but I swear, from a distance when I saw people wearing them it looked terrible. I just couldn’t deal with it, and ended up returning them to Footlocker.

 

[therealest1]

We definitely ain't getting 100% 1989 replication with these although that's what we obviously prefer, but I'm OK with getting these 2020 version if they're attainable on release day. These are acceptable for me unlike any other rehash that came out between 1989 to now. All of them were crappy! Just looked like bootleg swap meet shoes.

I swear the most noticeable differences for me especially when comparison pictures are posted are the originals are always beefier, bulkier in shape and the rehashes are always smaller with the shape details.

 

[airthompson]

Haven’t had a pair of these since 06. I’m in for one. Need those Military 4s.

 

[DB Cooper]

Have never owned this cw IV. In for a pair.

 

[ny2flbred]

The thirst for these are already there. They got our attention especially giving us an early look. As soon as the early in hand reviews start rolling out, the demand will skyrocket. Im prying for a fair chance to obtain to say the least.