Right about the quality issues. Really silly comment that the shoe should never of been re released. It’s been released X number of times since 1998, where has that guy been? Part timer

Plus if we follow that logic, we may as well throw every single Nike Air Max since the 87, every vintage Nike runner, every Jordan, into a vault and throw away the key.
Then we can all wear Lebrons, and the latest Nike runner technology year in year out.
People like retros. The shoe is only associated with the rave scene in the UK that was never what is what was intended for.
When Avirex made varsity jackets, they did not make them or market them for the So Solid Crew or Roll Deep! ( early UK Grime crews for my International colleagues) Neither did Evisu make Jeans for them. Need to separate what culture adopts, like association and nick names to what the product was originally intended for, it’s a running shoe like all the others, but with funky colorways. Dead discussion
The guy on the left is right, Nike adapt and market to these associations people made. But it’s all subjective.
Nike started jumping on the UK underground music scene, in the early 2000s, they made Dizzie rascal their first target, giving him is own shoe, then you saw Tiny Tempah years later get his own shoe, then most recently you saw Skepta. The AMP predates this marketing drive by Nike.