No Heisman Thread?

Originally Posted by dreClark

Yeah man, Stanford played a murderers row of defenses. Can't believe they escaped w/ a 12-1 record.


No matter what you say.Stanford played better defenses than Baylor.Baylor faced 6 defenses ranked 100th or below.Stanford played 2.Stanford played 4 top 60 defenses.Baylor played one. Try again.
 
Originally Posted by University of Nike

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

Oregon dude- you still havent won a bcs game.

But we waxed that @$# two years in a row.
pimp.gif


I didn't know the rose bowl was played in week 5 and week 9. Congrats.I'm not gonna threadjack. Enjoy your evening folks.
 
Originally Posted by Peep Game

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

Congrats to RG3, but the consistency of the Heisman is a joke.
Gerhart got knocked for having 4 losses and now RG3 wins it with 3.
In terms of being a QB Luck>>>>>> any body.
Gonna be a stud in the NFL.

razorsedge.gif

roll.gif
 
Originally Posted by dreClark

Oklahoma and Texas are ranked higher than any PacXII defense.

*shrugs*


What's Oklahoma and Oklahoma States pass defense?
 
TeamDef S&P+RkRushing
S&P+
RkPassing
S&P+
RkStandard
Downs
S&P+
RkPassing
Downs
S&P+
Rk
LSU172.51185.41169.31164.41147.95
Alabama168.72162.02167.22148.42185.01
Boise State140.83141.16146.35126.48130.717
Georgia136.64131.412138.67131.06134.315
Penn State134.95130.414151.83138.73136.914
Florida State132.86133.89124.718124.411130.518
Michigan State132.77138.98136.111136.04142.47
Oklahoma132.48140.37135.012134.55138.210
Texas132.39145.04137.19125.210158.52
Oregon129.710119.918143.66126.09138.211
Illinois127.411130.913131.813127.97126.121
Notre Dame124.712150.13112.628122.314124.324
South Carolina123.813102.753150.74123.312119.929
Virginia Tech123.414108.243138.48111.729154.54
Oklahoma State121.915112.237131.314112.827137.713
Utah121.916123.616124.119120.516125.422
Nebraska120.617115.526136.610109.533141.28
Rutgers119.818112.834127.316116.821137.712
Louisiana Tech119.319117.921121.521108.236157.23
Texas A&M117.720126.415119.822116.022138.69
ohwell.gif
 
Yeah that explains why Ok state and Ok are 88th and 102nd in pass defense given up.
 
Oklahoma State is the 8th ranked pass efficiency defense in the nation if you wanna nitpick.

From a pure numbers/averages standpoint (yes, I know these can sometimes be deceiving, but it's a pretty good overall look):

PAC-12
Average yards allowed per game = 432 (250 passing)
Average points allowed per game = 28 (1.79 passing TD)
Average pass efficiency defense = 138.8 rating, 62% completion, 7.33 yds/attempt

Andrew Luck: 264 passing yards/gm, 2.9 passing TD/gm, 70% completion, 8.5 yds/attempt, 167.5 rating, 35 TDs, 9 INTs

BIG 12
Average yards allowed per game = 422 (253 passing)
Average points allowed per game = 30 (1.67 passing TD)
Average pass efficiency defense = 131.5 rating, 60.7% completion, 7.2 yds/attempt

Robert Griffin III: 333 passing yards/gm, 3 passing TD/gm, 72.4% completion, 10.8 yds/attempt, 192.3 rating, 36 TDs, 6 INTs
 
No, you gotta understand.

Andrew Luck played against the types of defenses that RGIII would never be able to put up numbers on.

UCLA, CAL, OREGON, OREGON STATE, WAZZU, UCLA, USC ,

OMGGGGGGGGG. NFL PLAYERS EVERYWHERE.
Yeah that explains why Ok state and Ok are 88th and 102nd in pass defense given up.
12th and 14th, actually.
 
And if we wanna get into it, the Big 12 had better defensive stats while having four of the top 7 offenses in the nation, and eight in the top 55 (the Pac 12 had two in the top 11 and seven in the top 55).
 
Originally Posted by dreClark

No, you gotta understand.

Andrew Luck played against the types of defenses that RGIII would never be able to put up numbers on.

UCLA, CAL, OREGON, OREGON STATE, WAZZU, UCLA, USC ,

Pump the damn brakes.
 
When both players get to the next level (depending on the teams they go to), the sheer speed of the
game will catch up to Luck faster the RGIII. Those slow linebackers and non-aware DBs that Luck
ran over or ran around turn into Patrick Willis, Terrell Suggs, Ed Reed, and Darelle Revis at the next level.
 
All I know is that I'll be drafting RGIII next season in the final round of the fantasy draft as my backup QB and not Andrew Luck.
 
Originally Posted by Peep Game

When both players get to the next level (depending on the teams they go to), the sheer speed of the
game will catch up to Luck faster the RGIII. Those slow linebackers and non-aware DBs that Luck
ran over or ran around turn into Patrick Willis, Terrell Suggs, Ed Reed, and Darelle Revis at the next level.
Agreed.  Everyone wants to point out how Luck didn't have weapons and his receivers weren't able to create as much space.  When he gets to the NFL you think the defenders are going to be just as slow and the skill players are going to be that much better than the defensive players?  He is going to have to throw the ball in just as small of a window going up against bigger and faster defensive players.  So damn tired of hearing that argument for Lucks favor.  Griffin out performed Luck in every category.  Monte Ball is the one who has an argument of not getting enough votes.  Dude had one of the best years for a running back of all time and still came in 4th in the voting. 

Loved how it looked like Andrew Luck and his father were about to cry, dude thought he had it in the bag I could tell, was feeling himself entirely to much during the show.  Glad he got served up a slice of humble pie.
 
32 rushing TD's, 6 receiving TD's. 2014 total yards.
On a team that won the Big-10 and is playing in the Rose Bowl.

Montee Ball should have won the Heisman. However after Ball, RGIII was the most deserving. It's an award for best college player, not best pro prospect.

And I fell bad for Luck. ESPN is doing the same to him that they did to Tebow and the Heat. They hype him up way to much to the point that people root against him. He seems like a solid dude and there is no denying he is the best QB prospect for the NFL. However the "analysts" did him a disservice with all the flawless and second coming of Manning talk.
 
Originally Posted by airblaster503

Originally Posted by Peep Game

When both players get to the next level (depending on the teams they go to), the sheer speed of the
game will catch up to Luck faster the RGIII. Those slow linebackers and non-aware DBs that Luck
ran over or ran around turn into Patrick Willis, Terrell Suggs, Ed Reed, and Darelle Revis at the next level.
Agreed.  Everyone wants to point out how Luck didn't have weapons and his receivers weren't able to create as much space.  When he gets to the NFL you think the defenders are going to be just as slow and the skill players are going to be that much better than the defensive players?  He is going to have to throw the ball in just as small of a window going up against bigger and faster defensive players.  So damn tired of hearing that argument for Lucks favor.  Griffin out performed Luck in every category.  Monte Ball is the one who has an argument of not getting enough votes.  Dude had one of the best years for a running back of all time and still came in 4th in the voting. 

Loved how it looked like Andrew Luck and his father were about to cry, dude thought he had it in the bag I could tell, was feeling himself entirely to much during the show.  Glad he got served up a slice of humble pie.


Oh my god just stop.Andrew Luck is the best QB in the draft for a reason. Humble pie? Coming from the winner who annointed himself champion last week. You really have no clue about Andrew Luck and his demeanor.When Andrew Luck throws a ball into a tight window it's deemed as a bad throw, when Robert griffin throws a ball to a wide open wideout he is the most exciting player in college football. When Stanford is up 10-0, "Luck is struggling". When Baylor is down 35-0, the defense is at fault. You honestly find reasons to not like the guy. I'm starting to think it has more to do with pure jealously.
 
^^^
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
roll.gif
i love your trolling AndrewLuck. Very refreshing. Just to let you know though, RGIII actually threw his WRs open, or
DID fit the ball into tight windows. Even though Luck had those slow lumbering TEs and WRs on his team, they would still (somehow)
manage to be running free down the field. And when they make the catch, the announcers are like "OH MY GOD *FAP FAP FAP* DID
YOU SEE THAT BEAUTIFUL PINPOINT PRECISION PASS!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!", when the pass actually looked like the hail mary Tyler Palko
threw last week.

I do believe both QBs will be successful (depending on the team), but I see RGIII doing a lot more with his skill than Luck will with
his. Like I said before, the speed of the game will catch up to Luck, and you see what happened to Luck when there was real speed
and awareness on the field (Oregon). Dude was shook out of his mind, and looked like a completely average QB. RGIII may have had
more losses than Luck, but he never looked shook like Luck did either during those losses.
 
RG3 was down 35-0 against OSU, if you want to play the "I've only seen one game so that's how Andrew Luck must be".
Andrew Luck as someone said above is the Tim Tebow of this draft.
White collar guy, talks about his team mates more than himself, hyped up and then goes out there and puts up pretty impressive numbers but is over rated because the media hypes him up to be Messiah. People just don't wanna see Luck succeed for some reason. I just don't get it.
 
Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

RG3 was down 35-0 against OSU, if you want to play the "I've only seen one game so that's how Andrew Luck must be".
Andrew Luck as someone said above is the Tim Tebow of this draft.
White collar guy, talks about his team mates more than himself, hyped up and then goes out there and puts up pretty impressive numbers but is over rated because the media hypes him up to be Messiah. People just don't wanna see Luck succeed for some reason. I just don't get it.
Man nobody is arguing that he won't be that good in the NFL.  But he clearly didn't deserve to win the Heisman this year.  You can't go off the logic that because he might be the best prospect and might have the best NFL career that he should automatically win the Heisman.  That is what you are trying to do.  RG3 and Monte Ball had much more impressive games this year than Luck, and that is why RG3 won the damn trophy.  The Heisman is for the best player for the season, not the best NFL prospect.
 
Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

RG3 was down 35-0 against OSU, if you want to play the "I've only seen one game so that's how Andrew Luck must be".
Andrew Luck as someone said above is the Tim Tebow of this draft.
White collar guy, talks about his team mates more than himself, hyped up and then goes out there and puts up pretty impressive numbers but is over rated because the media hypes him up to be Messiah. People just don't wanna see Luck succeed for some reason. I just don't get it.

Who wants him to fail?

He gets too much hype though.
 
Originally Posted by airblaster503

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

RG3 was down 35-0 against OSU, if you want to play the "I've only seen one game so that's how Andrew Luck must be".
Andrew Luck as someone said above is the Tim Tebow of this draft.
White collar guy, talks about his team mates more than himself, hyped up and then goes out there and puts up pretty impressive numbers but is over rated because the media hypes him up to be Messiah. People just don't wanna see Luck succeed for some reason. I just don't get it.
Man nobody is arguing that he won't be that good in the NFL.  But he clearly didn't deserve to win the Heisman this year.  You can't go off the logic that because he might be the best prospect and might have the best NFL career that he should automatically win the Heisman.  That is what you are trying to do.  RG3 and Monte Ball had much more impressive games this year than Luck, and that is why RG3 won the damn trophy.  The Heisman is for the best player for the season, not the best NFL prospect.


Where did I say he should win it because of that? Nice reading comprehension. Why don't you like Andrew Luck?
 
Back
Top Bottom