- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
That's part of the reason why I am relatively on the fence with Iverson, how can a Top 50 player be on that list if he's made teamshe's joined worse, and held some teams back?Originally Posted by SneakerPro
I'm big on winning when it comes to all time greats.
That's why until last year I've always thought that Tim Duncan was the best player in the NBA after Shaq started getting old.
AI should probably make the list but people posting his stats as justification are ******ed.
The last two teams he left got CONSIDERABLY better after he got traded.
His most recent team got CONSIDERABLY worst once he got there.
These for the most part were one for one swaps as well so its not like a whole bunch of other talent was lost or gained.
These facts alone should tell you how "good" Allen Iverson really is as a player.
Dirk makes the list.
He has accomplished just as much as Charles Barkley and Karl Malone. He has won just as much as both of them and his stats are comparable.
Dirk has NEVER EVER played with another superstar or even Hall of Famer in his prime. You can say Steve Nash but dude ain't no Hall of Famer in my book.
I'm even a Dirk fan like that. He plays for my favorite team but to be honest I'm still not a huge fan of his game BUT you can't deny his impact on the court.
I look back on the 06 and the 07 teams and I still can't figure out how the won as much as they did.
I was surprised to see you be in favor of Dirk being considered on that list, I know your opinion on Dirk is strong, and if any of the Mavericks fans wouldoppose him being in there it'd be either you or Datz.