- 60,034
- 50,948
I was wrong
Still don't want Tim for 71. Not good enough.
Still don't want Tim for 71. Not good enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably but dude isn't young at all so I don't want himThe front office has the right idea of getting young guys to grow together, but they're doing it the wrong way.
Can we afford Jonathan Simmons with Melo and Lee gone?
I look at the teams that are currently competitive and don't see any that got there tanking. The best team in the history of the league, record wise, had one effing lottery pick. LA, Charlotte and Philly have done it and they are still competing against the Knicks for the next lottery pick I think we'll lose just fine without trying
I thought Klay was outside the top ten but I could be wrong. Harrison was so good for GS I forgot about him after 1 season but they did a great job with player development. OKC def benefited from their lottery picks and enjoyed success and appear to be the exception to the rule compared to the other teams I named. I'm not hating on lottery picks but to base your season on next years draft is just ****** basketball. Chemistry is so underrated these days. Like I always say, mehI look at the teams that are currently competitive and don't see any that got there tanking. The best team in the history of the league, record wise, had one effing lottery pick. LA, Charlotte and Philly have done it and they are still competing against the Knicks for the next lottery pick I think we'll lose just fine without trying
Idk how current you mean, but the Thunder were bad for consecutive seasons and it got them Durant, Westbrook and Harden. And do you mean Warriors only had one lottery pick? Weren't Harrison Barnes n Klay Thompson also lottery picks? So I'd say it's possible. But you gotta hit on your draft picks.
When's the deadline for ATL to match?