- 67,858
- 102,888
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
Man I just don't see it, i'm not giving Middleton no type of FU money.
**OFFICIAL 2019 NBA OFFSEASON THREAD**
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by HIM,
- Start date
- Status
- 25,220
- 44,805
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
Problem is the Bucks ain’t gon sign anybody in free agency and they have no trade pieces
- 23,444
- 30,094
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
Bucks might look real average next season
- 22,189
- 63,103
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
I don’t think people understand this when discussing small market teams. They let MIddleton walk...and replace him with who? Nobody better than him is signing there.
- 20,396
- 14,184
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Ingram/Ball/Hart +4 for Beal
MVP
Supporter
- 81,920
- 82,965
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
lawdog1
Supporter
- 58,224
- 68,753
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
- 20,396
- 14,184
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
With Wall's status being in the air, Lonzo coming to DC makes a lot of sense.
What do you think is a fair proposal?
Personally, I think Ingram (as long as the medicals check out) is an absolute must in a deal, and any 2/3 of Kuz/Hart/Ball plus a pick.
Beal, right now, IS the 2nd best 2-guard in the league. I think people (not saying you) don't understand just how good he is. Only 25 and not even in his prime yet.
MVP
Supporter
- 81,920
- 82,965
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
We're not giving up BI AND Zo for Beal. The #4 pick and Zo will have to suffice. Beal ain't worth 3 prospects including the 2 most valuable ones.
- 25,220
- 44,805
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
The Wiz should only trade Beal if they get crazy deal...he’s the franchise right now
MVP
Supporter
- 81,920
- 82,965
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
I think you're undervaluing Beal.
IF he's traded this summer, which he 1000000% should be, he'll bring back a VERY good return for the Wizards. #4 + Ball is flat out insulting
I know exactly how good Beal is, we won't be doing anything near giving up BI & Zo and a pick. That would be the centerpiece for an AD deal not Brad.
lawdog1
Supporter
- 58,224
- 68,753
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
If I was the Wiz, I definitely would not trade Beal for just 1 of the Lakers young guys, salary filler and No. 4 in this year’s draft.
- 44,302
- 65,702
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
Wiz are going to want a lotto pick from this year's draft plus a young prospect. Unless Memphis is giving up #2 I don't see them getting higher than #4. You're not getting equal value for any star in this league. Who has a better offer than Kuz and/or Zo +4?
- 86,350
- 113,305
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
I think one of Kuzma/Ingram, Hart and #4 should suffice for Beal.
lawdog1
Supporter
- 58,224
- 68,753
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
So, a proven all star, who’s getting your at least 24 and 4 a game, for one of 3 guys who might never be all-stars and the number 4 pick in a draft that everyone says is weak after the 3rd pick? Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me, but maybe the Wiz management will feel different.
MVP
Supporter
- 81,920
- 82,965
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Take out BI and put Zo in there and I agree, especially since he's the one they seem to covet.
- 86,350
- 113,305
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,928
- 15,883
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2013
Isn't Middleton a UFA? Bucks might not even be able to retain him
- 20,983
- 31,022
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
- 15,465
- 21,737
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
This article along with the Kawhi version of this article were both written about a week ago.
- 20,983
- 31,022
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
I would think the wizards would demand BI in a deal but what leverage do they have
lawdog1
Supporter
- 58,224
- 68,753
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
What’s the Lakers’ leverage in negotiating with the Wizards? Pretty clear teams aren’t going to roll over and do the Lakers favors anymore. I suspect the Wiz would rather stand pat than accept a low ball offer for Beal.
- Status
