Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread

[Magic33]

I look at the zip tie like I do the Nike Air hang tag. The one on this 2019 IV, a lot of people used to wear them in the 80's and 90's.
and Timb ones.

Whatever your preference is.

 

[caroquintero]

 

[killaking]

But most ppl talking crap about em now were likely beasting over them in 2013.

Ill admit I did, then the 2016's came around..... yea you can keep the trash, shoes are dead last in terms of ones next to the ones with the Jumpman

 

[lamont sanford]

To watch the avengers try to wear these at least once a month

 

[tonytobacco]

I’m a head case, I love my 2013 breds.

2013 breds were truly something in hand from what i remember

 

[caroquintero]

2013 breds were truly something in hand from what i remember

The red they used really stood out..

 

[hiphopsays]

with everyone looking to strip the lakers pair thought I post this OG pair of the black bottom CHIs ... looks like from the production date these dropped circa ‘86.

IG: jimmysprinklesvintage

 

[hiphopsays]

I would get rid of the 4Lab1 .... I like 1s and I like 4s had I thought this through this wouldn’t be part of my collection - the textile that age the worst on the 4 with glow in the dark detailing SMH

 

[tonytobacco]

with everyone looking to strip the lakers pair thought I post this OG pair of the black bottom CHIs ... looks like from the production date these dropped circa ‘86.

IG: jimmysprinklesvintage

the black surface really shows off the outsole well

 

[bashmilk]

if you can make any 1's disappear from ever releasing with the snap of a finger, which would you choose. Only one and choose wisely lol

Highlight reels.
Defiants
Westbrook PE.

 

[lamont sanford]

Nothing wrong with opinions I own multiples of both and I would handpick 2016’s a million times more over then that cardboard finish on the 2013s. Not here to start a back and forth but really don’t get what people see in 2013’s now if you guys would have said 2001 then yeah I would have to really put some thought behind this statement but those 2013’s are terrible

 

[xRuck]

Nothing wrong with opinions I own multiples of both and I would handpick 2016’s a million times more over then that cardboard finish on the 2013s. Not here to start a back and forth but really don’t get what people see in 2013’s now if you guys would have said 2001 then yeah I would have to really put some thought behind this statement but those 2013’s are terrible

So what you are saying 2013 is m.Bison from sfiv and 2016 is m.Bison from sfv. 2001 is m.bison from snk vs capcom.

 

[126006]

We all know the recents are better than the 2013. It’s just that the breds have an emotional attachment for me. It was also my first purchase from an NTer after getting scammed and striking out everywhere.

 

[Magic33]

Nothing wrong with opinions I own multiples of both and I would handpick 2016’s a million times more over then that cardboard finish on the 2013s. Not here to start a back and forth but really don’t get what people see in 2013’s now if you guys would have said 2001 then yeah I would have to really put some thought behind this statement but those 2013’s are terrible

You're looking at leather quality, many of us are looking at color and tumbled leather. And 2001's have a nubuck swoosh and they aren't a high. So when you look at the 3, the 2013's are more accurate to OG's.

Since SBB's everyone thinks they're some sort of leather expert like 2016's are some amazing leather, they're not.

 

[onlyjs]

You're looking at leather quality, many of us are looking at color and tumbled leather. And 2001's have a nubuck swoosh and they aren't a high. So when you look at the 3, the 2013's are more accurate to OG's.

Since SBB's everyone thinks they're some sort of leather expert like 2016's are some amazing leather, they're not.

This is why I pick 2013 color and non tumble leather

 

[0takusamsay]

You're looking at leather quality, many of us are looking at color and tumbled leather. And 2001's have a nubuck swoosh and they aren't a high. So when you look at the 3, the 2013's are more accurate to OG's.

Since SBB's everyone thinks they're some sort of leather expert like 2016's are some amazing leather, they're not.

Ok, this needs to be corrected. The 01s are a high, if you stand them up next to a 2013 theres no difference in height. The 01s just look squatter because all the padding at the ankle and the placement of the wings logo.

 

[126006]

I’m still planning on grabbing a 2013 royal and dumping my 2017 pair.

 

[0takusamsay]

01, 13, 16. I definitely prefer the 16 because it's the closest and has a nice slimmer profile Also a detail that's on the 85 that's also on the remasters is that back tab, its thin and not wide like all other releases after the 94 and before the frag.

They're all high, yall really gotta stop calling 01's mids unless you can side by side them.

 

[Magic33]

Ok, this needs to be corrected. The 01s are a high, if you stand them up next to a 2013 theres no difference in height. The 01s just look squatter because all the padding at the ankle and the placement of the wings logo.

Didn't meant to set you off, but I was saying as high, because people also mention the 2013 not being as high as the 2016.

 

[casper90403]

i only wear my '13s except for chicago's (royals, shadows, black toes, black/reds). Love them.

 

[0takusamsay]

 

[bballermarkie]

Feeling matchy matchy today

 

[bballermarkie]

so funny... but I wouldn’t say it’s the same. Wearing a StockX tag is much worse.

I played basketball with someone yesterday with lucky charm Kyrie's with the stockx tag on em. Don't know what he's thinking lol

 

[casper90403]

Opinions on copping frags off sites like GOAT and stockx. I want to see the shoe in person before copping but just can’t find my size anywhere locally.

Is goat/stockx good with sending shoes back if they have any scrape/blemish on the shoe?

Looking for opinions. Not a fan of copping $1000+ shoes without seeing them in person.

 

[headdetective]

Coppin those shorts before the week is out.