- 3,807
- 2,156
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
Yeah, well, for me at least. I'm usually a size 8, but for this one I went down half a size
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro Low OG Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by quise2024,
- Start date
Yeah, well, for me at least. I'm usually a size 8, but for this one I went down half a size
sneakaprince
Supporter
- 16,166
- 19,373
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
Thank you!
sneakaprince
Supporter
- 16,166
- 19,373
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
Assuming very high stock on 85s. I just had a bid accepted for 125 (size 9) on SX.
- 3,846
- 7,934
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
How’s the leather on these?Got my pair here in PH. I love this pair!
The fit's pretty much similar to the regular OG 1 lows. The box is a surprise - it's slim, compared to the Jordan 1 box that we usually get. Nike logo and Swoosh are embossed on the box. Collar's puffy as hell too. Comfort-wise, it's up there with the High 85's and Air Ships.
Don't sleep on these
- 3,846
- 7,934
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
I put a bid in and the guy on stockx increased his ask by $20. Hopefully they all lose money. Bunch a bums
- 2,963
- 358
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
Shoe of the year IMO.Tempted to get these... His fit is making these look on point...
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
This guy smokin’ some good stuff!
- 6,480
- 6,962
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Best retro+ low 1 color way of the year folks! You heard it here first
- 400
- 435
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2022
Damn, I really hope this hits SNKRS next week.
This is one of the sheos I was waiting for (after I struck out on the 8's).
This is one of the sheos I was waiting for (after I struck out on the 8's).
- 1,189
- 3,890
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
They’re nice but what the hell, why aren’t they white??
(Pic from Reddit)
(Pic from Reddit)
- 14,547
- 19,216
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
Because they're going for an aged look, hence the slightly yellowed midsole
- 1,080
- 1,504
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2013
I wouldn't go that far but they are nice. Give me them over the white /Red or the 85s. Them **** are fighting
- 6,480
- 6,962
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
I feel like actual white on shoes is becoming a rarity smh
- 6,480
- 6,962
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Not only the color but the entire forefoot is noticeably more square and wider on top of the boxy toebox. It's a low but up until the back it actually looks like a taller shoe.They’re nice but what the hell, why aren’t they white??
(Pic from Reddit)
- 3,702
- 8,724
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2014
could be how the highs are stretched over a shoe last when the board is being lasted? The materials used on those shoes seems to be less forgiving compared to the other iteration of ones (og high, jumpman highs). Lows are probably easier since you dont have the extra ankle color to fit over a last. Just my guess.
- 6,480
- 6,962
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
It probably is, but you'd think this would be taken into account when producing a low. Whatever, I'll buy these, pull out the iron and get the toe box looking proper. But that doesn't look right the way it's shipping at a new higher price.
- 20,026
- 10,864
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Can you show us the insole, good sir? (Like, pulled out of the shoe.) I want to know if they use the same polyurethane one as the $200 Highs and Ships.
- 3,846
- 7,934
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
why the toebox look like
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
Look at the difference of the toeboxes.They’re nice but what the hell, why aren’t they white??
(Pic from Reddit)
The high sucks so much.
- 3,846
- 7,934
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
LOOL SPOON IS BLIND. They equally as badLook at the difference of the toeboxes.
The high sucks so much.
Underrated
- 17,868
- 21,165
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
Keep pushing those 1 lows (ballsack leather?) they still just a retro + colorway. Grey toebox color blocking is a choice..
The OG ng1 colorway is just that.. an OG colorway. And superior.
The OG ng1 colorway is just that.. an OG colorway. And superior.
- 3,846
- 7,934
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
Neutrals nice I just gotta see a pair with a. Nice toebox. These greys aren’t bad at all
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,401
- 39,117
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
That’s a terrible angle. Give me a good pics and angles of this shoe and I’ll weigh in. However, the high ‘85 toebox sucks as I’ve mentioned over and over.
- 6,480
- 6,962
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Pushin? Lol no one is trying to sell em here dawg. We all know they aren’t OG. Not that this OG pair looks very OG at all
