- 536
- 1,263
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
my total came to $178.50 CAD
Official Nike Air Max '91 BW Thread
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by maxswoosh713,
- Start date
- 11,778
- 14,362
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- 11,778
- 14,362
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
i would have pulled for that, not sure why it doesn't give it to me.
- 7,215
- 12,956
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2004
For anyone ordering, the sizing they list is very weird. US 10.5 normally is not IT (EU?) 43,5, US10 is not 43.Actually 170 CAD + taxes and free shipping
Nike for Men SS24 Collection | SSENSE Canada
Buy Nike clothing & accessories and get Free Shipping & Returns in Canada. Shop the latest SS24 collection of Nike for Men on SSENSE.com. Find what you are looking for amongst our directional selection of designer fashion and luxury streetwear.www.ssense.com
Got a 10 and 10.5, will keep the one that fits better and exchange the other. Most likely to triple on these.
Beware.
- 1,496
- 1,329
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
- 13,096
- 28,976
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
Whats up next on the drop list for BWs?
- 15
- 36
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
Yeah noticed that right after completing my order, hope the North American sizing takes precedence but anyway there's free returns for Canadian residents.
- 15
- 36
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
Just received my BWs from Ssense and as I assumed the US size was the correct one...still not sure about which one of the 10 or 10.5 to return tho...
A replacement was really needed!
A replacement was really needed!
- 7,324
- 30,477
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
if the window aint big is it still a BW
- 15
- 36
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
To be fair the airbag seems bigger than the 2016's, the tongue is as huge and fat as it could be, the shape appears to be fixed and materials and color seem similar to the OG. Overall it's a great release, and it feels a lot more comfortable than the 2016s. I really hope the shape on the leather '94 retro won't be too boxy.
I'm pretty sure that they put an airbag upfront as it has the same feel as my 2020 Infrareds & Lasers, maybe someone can confirm that info?
- 15,958
- 22,270
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
the only way to find out is to do a side by side comparison with the new release together with the previous release to see the differences
- 1,496
- 1,329
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
Well the guy in the video i posted above seemed to be disapointed in the fact that they didnt seem to be as comfy as the 90s so i dont know what to believe?
- 1,246
- 2,174
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2004
- 7,324
- 30,477
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
copping either way since i didn't get the 2016 retro and my 2013 retro has gotten a lot of action.
- 536
- 1,263
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
just received my pair no complaints , I hated my 2016s
FAT tongue CHECK
shape CHECK
stuffing around ankle collar CHECK
toe box shape CHECK
purple paint looks like it is baked into the midsole so that might correct paint cracking soo CHECK
big window CHECK (different style with the lip edge but the air bag is way softer than 2016 more like the 2008
OG box CHECK
anatomical arch CHECK
perfect retro CHECK
will have a YOUTUBE video on these soon compared to my 2008 (2016 sold)
FAT tongue CHECK
shape CHECK
stuffing around ankle collar CHECK
toe box shape CHECK
purple paint looks like it is baked into the midsole so that might correct paint cracking soo CHECK
big window CHECK (different style with the lip edge but the air bag is way softer than 2016 more like the 2008
OG box CHECK
anatomical arch CHECK
perfect retro CHECK
will have a YOUTUBE video on these soon compared to my 2008 (2016 sold)
- 536
- 1,263
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
- 6,727
- 4,630
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2003
Dope. Nice to hear.
Anyone actually ever use the arch inserts?
need these on a discount though
- 9,206
- 32,113
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
Curious to see these in pictures outside/under natural light.
All these inside pics make the Persian/violet/purple look so dull. Understandably so.
All these inside pics make the Persian/violet/purple look so dull. Understandably so.
- 281
- 237
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
So im seeing the new date is 09/11 now wonder why it got pushed back so far is it still the fallout from that container ship I wonder.
- 645
- 1,735
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2017
- 536
- 1,263
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
- 13,096
- 28,976
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
Whats the verdict, is the window actually bigger, or does it just appear a little bigger because of that carved out groove around it?
- 29
- 75
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
Mine showed up today. Ordered my regular air max size, same as all my AM3's from last year. I would say even though they look the same size next to my other shoes they do have more room lengthwise. I almost could go down a full size compared to my AM3.
Due to their unique construction they are stiffer than the AM3 but the underfoot comfort seems comparable in the limited time I have been wearing them.
**Update: I wore these today to work. I walk 10 plus miles a day for work. The AM3 retro is much more comfortable. These aren't uncomfortable but not amazing like I find the AM3. I find that the forefoot cushioning is quite hard and unforgiving. Again my feet aren't sore but they aren't pillows that's for sure.
I think most people will be happy with this version of the shoe.
Last edited:
- 9,206
- 32,113
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
Mine showed up today. Ordered my regular air max size, same as all my AM3's from last year. I would say even though they look the same size next to my other shoes they do have more room lengthwise. I almost could go down a full size compared to my AM3.
Due to their unique construction they are stiffer than the AM3 but the underfoot comfort seems comparable in the limited time I have been wearing them.
I think most people will be happy with this version of the shoe.
Appreciate the sizing info compared to the AMIII. Very helpful.
