- 645
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2007
here.ive posted these before.
crappy result
and as far as the skate shot goes, i underexposed the background since the sun was still very high that day. while i used my sunpak383 (off camera flash) tolight up the skater.
i know where the sun was and i used that to my advantage. so since shooting against the sun creates a shadow i located where the shadow was going to be andplaced my flash to light it up there
notice the shadow of the kid. its pointing towards to the left since the sun was HIGH RIGHT.
it was all in one shot. u just have to properly expose the subject. i actually even underexposed the background but since the sun was harsh, underexposing itturned out to be perfect exposure.
also look at these photos.
i think my settings were about @ f/8 1/250 iso 100 or somewhere around there. just check exif . i never get rid of my exif since i RARELY do any heavy pp.
i found that my work flow is much more efficient.
except for the rig shots.....those are time consuming. thats why i charge for my photoshoots = time is money = takes quite an effort to bring out my lightinggear + rig = takes awhile to edit the rig out in photoshop
thats why i be salty. son. a lot of effort goes into my photoshoots and when someone takes those photos from me, it just pisses me off.
crappy result
and as far as the skate shot goes, i underexposed the background since the sun was still very high that day. while i used my sunpak383 (off camera flash) tolight up the skater.
i know where the sun was and i used that to my advantage. so since shooting against the sun creates a shadow i located where the shadow was going to be andplaced my flash to light it up there
notice the shadow of the kid. its pointing towards to the left since the sun was HIGH RIGHT.
it was all in one shot. u just have to properly expose the subject. i actually even underexposed the background but since the sun was harsh, underexposing itturned out to be perfect exposure.
also look at these photos.
i think my settings were about @ f/8 1/250 iso 100 or somewhere around there. just check exif . i never get rid of my exif since i RARELY do any heavy pp.
i found that my work flow is much more efficient.
except for the rig shots.....those are time consuming. thats why i charge for my photoshoots = time is money = takes quite an effort to bring out my lightinggear + rig = takes awhile to edit the rig out in photoshop
thats why i be salty. son. a lot of effort goes into my photoshoots and when someone takes those photos from me, it just pisses me off.