- 18,386
- 34,060
these preprint servers are actually a great service to the scientific community. the old school process is great for its peer review but it is slow and charges a lot of money.big yikes. someone/some people are getting fired. why/how does a server essentially printing out rough/first drafts exist to the public?
there's a lot of rigor that goes into journal articles. the investigators themselves, statisticians on the team who are there only for maths, their editors/advisers, then finally peer-reviews. people gotta get fired/discredited.
the problem with the preprint servers is that, despite the giant warning they put at the top of every page that the articles are not yet peer-reviewed, people still run with them and they get posted as "news". that's not what they're intended for. maybe they need some sort of login so that not everybody can instantly access the articles?
the people who should get fired are the ones at the newspaper who write a news article based on something in a preprint server without getting an expert to review it first.