dacomeup
Supporter
- 25,219
- 34,434
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
Nate probably out ahead of his skis right now, but interesting nonetheless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I know you can't see my posts aepps20 because the libbie conjecture and innuendo echo chamber has exiled me but know this: I am always here with you, guiding you, side-by-side, against Kale Gang, every step of the way.What I find funny is how these Soi Boys and their Bots are putting up all these ads on NT. I can't see posts by Dwalk and whywesteppin but I can see conjecture and innuendo from Rusty, Rex and Belgium. Let's just say that this is a Soros funded attack against Coal Gang but WE will not be defeated. We aren't racist. YOU ARE LIBS.
While their might be some validity to your argument, but not every WaPo writer is a millionaire trying to defend Bezos. If a junior writer Wonkblog points out the Stop Bezos Act was poorly written, I don't think they should be dismissed on your criteria.
Also to explore where the line is:
So say if say someone like Krugman, or Ezra Klein points out the flaws in Sanders economic plans, they should be dissed because they are rich liberals. Even though they make a sound argument? Or if rich liberals like Adam Sewer and Coates call him out for his absolving voters motivated by racism, do you assume those are being mad in bad faith too?
Because seems you, like many Sanders supporters, shoot the messenger once it is coming from a particular source, and only accept narrow criticism from messengers you find acceptable.